[FEEDBACK] Should Liquid Storage Modules be renamed

This forum is the ideal place for all discussion relating to X4. You will also find additional information from developers here.

Moderator: Moderators for English X Forum

Post Reply
Nanook
Moderator (English)
Moderator (English)
Posts: 27865
Joined: Thu, 15. May 03, 20:57
x4

Re: [FEEDBACK] Should Liquid Storage Modules be renamed

Post by Nanook » Sun, 21. Jun 20, 00:33

Nort The Fragrent wrote:
Sat, 20. Jun 20, 00:43
Hang on a minuet !

If they are ( liquified gas containers ), you would need some kind of restraint to keep the liquified containers from seeping away. Them being all liquified an all.
Thats being pedantic. !
:)
No, that's you being Penny and me being Sheldon. :P

I guess I could've said liquified-gas containers, eh?
However, general understanding of the term liquified gas containers is that of containers containing liquified gas, not containers made of liquified gas, Penny. :P Or, as Sheldon would do, :roll:
Have a great idea for the current or a future game? You can post it in the [L3+] Ideas forum.

X4 is a journey, not a destination. Have fun on your travels.

User avatar
alt3rn1ty
Posts: 2370
Joined: Thu, 26. Jan 06, 19:45
x4

Re: [FEEDBACK] Should Liquid Storage Modules be renamed

Post by alt3rn1ty » Sun, 21. Jun 20, 01:18

I think Nort The Fragrants suggestion of just calling them Gas is the best suggestion so far.

Just replace Liquid with Gas in all the relevant named Modules

Simplifies it for less confusion, and less changing to do for the devs.
Laptop Dell G15 5510 : Win 11 x64
CPU - 10th Gen' Core I7 10870H 2.2-5.0ghz, GPU - NVidia Geforce RTX 3060, VRAM 6gb GDDR5,
RAM - 32gb (2x16gb, Dual Channel mode set in BIOS) DDR4 2933mhz Kingston Fury Impact,
SSD - Kioxia M.2 NVME 512gb (System), + Samsung M.2 NVME 970 Evo Plus 1tb (Games)

:boron: Long live Queen Polypheides and may her tentacles always be supple.
Seeker of Sohnen.

User avatar
Nort The Fragrent
Posts: 954
Joined: Fri, 5. Jan 18, 21:00
x4

Re: [FEEDBACK] Should Liquid Storage Modules be renamed

Post by Nort The Fragrent » Sun, 21. Jun 20, 19:13

Penny gets the big tick :)

Gas it is then :)

All agreed. :)

:D

Morleond
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon, 25. Feb 19, 20:34
x4

Re: [FEEDBACK] Should Liquid Storage Modules be renamed

Post by Morleond » Thu, 2. Jul 20, 20:46

Most gasses are actually stored in their liquid form that's why they are liquid containers.

leoriq
Posts: 365
Joined: Wed, 20. Mar 13, 06:42
x3ap

Re: [FEEDBACK] Should Liquid Storage Modules be renamed

Post by leoriq » Fri, 3. Jul 20, 15:58

alt3rn1ty wrote:
Wed, 17. Jun 20, 21:04
"Teladi M Liquid Storage" would become ..

"Teladi M Liquid Gas Storage" or ..
I believe dev made the same mistake as you: there is no liquid gas, as @pref said, there is liquefied gas, therefore proper wording would be Liquefied Storage, and that would instantly give out that water doesn't goes there, as it can't be liquefied :D

But as we already have those ugly (Mineral) and (Gas) in ship names, it would be wise to rename Liquid Storage to Gas Storage and Solid Storage to Mineral Storage.
I don't care how the stuff is stored, actually, I only care about what kind of stuff there is.
Signature yes signature a GIGANTIC SIGNATURE!!

Post Reply

Return to “X4: Foundations”