Battles feel largely stagnant
Moderator: Moderators for English X Forum
-
- Posts: 590
- Joined: Tue, 2. Sep 14, 09:15
Battles feel largely stagnant
One thing I always loved in science fiction: the big, epic space battle.
However, battles in X4 feel largely the same, no matter the class of ship you're flying. Fighters zip about and plink at each other with pretty much the same weapons (was there some sort of Weapon Accords, where all factions had to use the same style of weapon?). Capital ships, which should naturally instill terror, basically act like upscaled fighters. The shield delay mechanic also completely ruins battles. Ships larger than a fighter have no real staying power, you just shoot them until they explode. There's really no purpose in destroying hardpoints.
Back in X3, you actually learned not to punch above your weight class, as their shields often had a higher recharge rate than the damage your guns dealt. This created a similar sense to Elite Dangerous, where the only way for a fighter to damage a capital ship was to attack the weak points and remove its ability to fight.
Capital ships actually felt like mobile fortresses, fighters felt different between each race, even weapons were nicely varied. But in X4, there's literally nothing stopping me from parking as close to the ship as I can, and pop-up shooting at the turrets. Completely destroys the immersion and cinematic sense.
However, battles in X4 feel largely the same, no matter the class of ship you're flying. Fighters zip about and plink at each other with pretty much the same weapons (was there some sort of Weapon Accords, where all factions had to use the same style of weapon?). Capital ships, which should naturally instill terror, basically act like upscaled fighters. The shield delay mechanic also completely ruins battles. Ships larger than a fighter have no real staying power, you just shoot them until they explode. There's really no purpose in destroying hardpoints.
Back in X3, you actually learned not to punch above your weight class, as their shields often had a higher recharge rate than the damage your guns dealt. This created a similar sense to Elite Dangerous, where the only way for a fighter to damage a capital ship was to attack the weak points and remove its ability to fight.
Capital ships actually felt like mobile fortresses, fighters felt different between each race, even weapons were nicely varied. But in X4, there's literally nothing stopping me from parking as close to the ship as I can, and pop-up shooting at the turrets. Completely destroys the immersion and cinematic sense.
The Teladi are known for creating a standardized currency, ship insurance, and insurance fraud.
-
- Posts: 7826
- Joined: Sat, 14. Feb 04, 23:07
Re: Battles feel largely stagnant
Why? It's only the S fighters which have noticeable shield regen delay, for M's it's less than a second, for anything bigger there simply isn't a delay at all.ZombiePotatoSalad wrote: ↑Tue, 2. Mar 21, 10:23The shield delay mechanic also completely ruins battles.
Re: Battles feel largely stagnant
Mind this detail mentioned by ZombiePotatoSalad:GCU Grey Area wrote: ↑Tue, 2. Mar 21, 10:48Why? It's only the S fighters which have noticeable shield regen delay, for M's it's less than a second, for anything bigger there simply isn't a delay at all.ZombiePotatoSalad wrote: ↑Tue, 2. Mar 21, 10:23The shield delay mechanic also completely ruins battles.
I also don't like that the game allows those cheese tactics. X:Rebirth did a better job there by having a lot of drones on every capital ship. But there was also a backdoor - once the drone launchpad was destroyed, this threat was gone. And cheesing down turrets / engines / hull was possible again.ZombiePotatoSalad wrote: ↑Tue, 2. Mar 21, 10:23Capital ships actually felt like mobile fortresses, fighters felt different between each race, even weapons were nicely varied. But in X4, there's literally nothing stopping me from parking as close to the ship as I can, and pop-up shooting at the turrets. Completely destroys the immersion and cinematic sense.
---
I personally like flying those mobile fortresses (everything above / equal L class) in X4 because of the constant shield recharge. I can't stand a M being overwhelmed because the shield got depleted (and shield recharge is too slow) - and I don't like being defenseless (less to no hull, no boost) once a S shield is depleted (because of the huge shield recharge delay).
So against NPCs I only have to flee in my capital ships if I get swarmed. (by huge Xenon drone or N,M & P swarms)
Well, and against capitals one always should bring a fleet. 1:1 are no fun, not even when flying the same ship / type. (it's just boring and not as entertaining as e.g. boarding). Mostly it's just "be quick or die" - so those experiences have to be rushed, which is a shame
Last edited by chew-ie on Tue, 2. Mar 21, 14:38, edited 1 time in total.
Spoiler
Show
BurnIt: Boron and leaks don't go well together...
Königinnenreich von Boron: Sprich mit deinem Flossenführer
Nila Ti: Folgt mir, ihr Kavalkade von neugierigen Kreaturen!
Pick yourpoison seed [for custom gamestarts]
Feature request: paint jobs on custom starts
Königinnenreich von Boron: Sprich mit deinem Flossenführer
Nila Ti: Folgt mir, ihr Kavalkade von neugierigen Kreaturen!
Pick your
Feature request: paint jobs on custom starts
Re: Battles feel largely stagnant
Thats why many people use mods
If you want to have combat closer to X3 and XR, VRO may be for you.
If you want to have combat closer to X3 and XR, VRO may be for you.
-
- Posts: 7826
- Joined: Sat, 14. Feb 04, 23:07
Re: Battles feel largely stagnant
Works both ways. Have lost count of the number of times I've lost engines (& other subsystems) to fighters, usually due to torps or heavy swarm missiles. Often this ends with destruction of my ship if there are enemy capitals nearby to finish the job.chew-ie wrote: ↑Tue, 2. Mar 21, 11:59Mind this detail mentioned by ZombiePotatoSalad:
I also don't like that the game allows those cheese tactics. X:Rebirth did a better job there by having a lot of drones on every ship. But there was also a backdoor - once the drone launchpad was destroyed, this thread was gone. And cheesing down turrets / engines / hull was possible again.ZombiePotatoSalad wrote: ↑Tue, 2. Mar 21, 10:23Capital ships actually felt like mobile fortresses, fighters felt different between each race, even weapons were nicely varied. But in X4, there's literally nothing stopping me from parking as close to the ship as I can, and pop-up shooting at the turrets. Completely destroys the immersion and cinematic sense.
One of the reasons I prefer combat in X4 is that I don't feel invulnerable when flying a capital (whereas in X3 did not enjoy flying anything bigger than M6 - ploughing through hordes of fighters that could do nothing to me just wasn't much fun). I have to keep an eye on all those S/M fighters around me & pay attention to what they're armed with - they do pose a distinct threat, particularly if they're configured as bombers. If I don't prioritise them they can make a real mess of my ship.
-
- Posts: 590
- Joined: Tue, 2. Sep 14, 09:15
Re: Battles feel largely stagnant
I thought of VRO, but I don't like how it adds random X3 ships that don't follow the design of the current day.Shuulo wrote: ↑Tue, 2. Mar 21, 14:04Thats why many people use mods
If you want to have combat closer to X3 and XR, VRO may be for you.
The Teladi are known for creating a standardized currency, ship insurance, and insurance fraud.
Re: Battles feel largely stagnant
its only few ships, and their textures will be vastly improved with patch that will come out after COH. To each its own i guess.ZombiePotatoSalad wrote: ↑Tue, 2. Mar 21, 15:59I thought of VRO, but I don't like how it adds random X3 ships that don't follow the design of the current day.Shuulo wrote: ↑Tue, 2. Mar 21, 14:04Thats why many people use mods
If you want to have combat closer to X3 and XR, VRO may be for you.
-
- Posts: 374
- Joined: Mon, 23. May 16, 02:02
Re: Battles feel largely stagnant
I really like X4 battles right now. It could use some more turret variation and more faction logic use of fleets could be improved a lot. I also think that some turret ranges/damage could be changed to be more popular (example: scatter gun turrets, beam turrets...)
-
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Fri, 4. Jan 19, 12:42
Re: Battles feel largely stagnant
I agree, battles are very boring and simplistic. They feel very "unnatural", so to say.
Re: Battles feel largely stagnant
I wish fighters in general specialized in disabling big ships/stations rather than killing them.
I've said this before but currently S military ships are top in the food chain (ok they suck against stations). M military ships are useless (unless piloted by the player) and L ships are only used as siege cannons against stations.
I've said this before but currently S military ships are top in the food chain (ok they suck against stations). M military ships are useless (unless piloted by the player) and L ships are only used as siege cannons against stations.
-
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Sun, 7. Feb 16, 17:28
Re: Battles feel largely stagnant
VRO is a must, even if it is a bit overkill. Vanilla combat is lame and boring.
Re: Battles feel largely stagnant
Watch any Youtube summary and you will always see big, epic space battles.ZombiePotatoSalad wrote: ↑Tue, 2. Mar 21, 10:23One thing I always loved in science fiction: the big, epic space battle.
As to taking a long time, look at the story about the Battle of the River Plate. They take time.
Re: Battles feel largely stagnant
They are. Put thermal disintegrators or for pure disabling burst lasers and then when you order Attack, open up the little config panel (+) and select "shoot to disable".
Re: Battles feel largely stagnant
If you want epic battles, VRO and the various ship packs compatible with VRO are the way to go.
viewtopic.php?f=146&t=428282&p=4965058#p4965058
7.0 Dev Feedback playthrough and general streaming
https://www.twitch.tv/dreamweaver_mana
7.0 Dev Feedback playthrough and general streaming
https://www.twitch.tv/dreamweaver_mana
Re: Battles feel largely stagnant
One has to face the facts IMHO. The OP is (my opinion again) correct in the point of battles being boring, especially the big ones.
I think that by negating the damage taken (it shows as damage but does not slows down ships/takes off their weapons except only on L/XL ships) fighting gets too "unbelievable" and troublesome, which takes away the key element of "fun".
Mods can help, but that is not the answer, or the reason for the post (or else it would have been "Which mod should I use for..."). I believe that also a major factor in this "disappointment" is that the player spends too much on a map instead of flying around blasting things off or watching the scenery or the battles in progress, whichever pleases the most...
I think that by negating the damage taken (it shows as damage but does not slows down ships/takes off their weapons except only on L/XL ships) fighting gets too "unbelievable" and troublesome, which takes away the key element of "fun".
Mods can help, but that is not the answer, or the reason for the post (or else it would have been "Which mod should I use for..."). I believe that also a major factor in this "disappointment" is that the player spends too much on a map instead of flying around blasting things off or watching the scenery or the battles in progress, whichever pleases the most...
-
- Posts: 374
- Joined: Mon, 23. May 16, 02:02
Re: Battles feel largely stagnant
More patrol jobs for factions should make battles and big clashes more constant thus increasing the probability of dynamic engagements.