Therefore I wish to unsee this, and
I warn the reader: this picture will make you unhappy.
I've put Boa, Buffalo and S Storage in one picture.
Spoiler
Show
It's clearly visible that L trader has 14 time more the volume of actual storage than M trader. And S Storage is six times bigger than L trader. I've counted only the volume of actual containers shown, not whole models. Also note that L storage in the back has 18 containers vs 3 containers of S storage.
In short, we see 14:1 for L vs M, 6:1 for S storage vs L trader, and 6:1 for L storage vs S storage.
Their ingame capacities? 2.13:1 for L vs M, 1.56:1 for S storage vs L trader, and 40:1 for L storage vs S storage.
I believe more visually consistent numbers would be 105 000 for Buffalo, 600 000 for S storage, and 3 600 000 for L storage.
In short, we see 14:1 for L vs M, 6:1 for S storage vs L trader, and 6:1 for L storage vs S storage.
Their ingame capacities? 2.13:1 for L vs M, 1.56:1 for S storage vs L trader, and 40:1 for L storage vs S storage.
I believe more visually consistent numbers would be 105 000 for Buffalo, 600 000 for S storage, and 3 600 000 for L storage.
P.S. Again, as it seems to be missed: I've counted only the volume of actual containers shown, not whole models.