Moderator: Moderators for English X Forum
Eh I know you're saying it part in jet but that's still false btw. Anyone who born in the US are qualified to be naturally born citizen. Else Obama wouldn't be the previous president. Trump was born in New York, and that's the only thing that matter regarding that particular qualification to hold the President office. It doesn't matter even if his father was an Alien born on Mar.
Damnit, you are right.Mightysword wrote: ↑Fri, 5. Apr 19, 01:07Eh I know you're saying it part in jet but that's still false btw. Anyone who born in the US are qualified to be naturally born citizen.
Gimli wrote:Let the Orcs come as thick as summer-moths round a candle!
But..Masterbagger wrote: ↑Sat, 6. Apr 19, 04:39Can't breath. Too funny.
https://babylonbee.com/news/joe-biden-a ... ead-of-tsa
The man with the Most Punchable face in politics... His picture is in the dictionary under "Tool." If "condescending" had a face, his would be it. I've heard him talk a few times and there is an unmistakable sound of a thousand infants screaming if you listen very closely...RegisterMe wrote: ↑Tue, 9. Apr 19, 14:17I think we'll be hearing more of this chap. He's quite scary.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_M ... l_advisor)
You weren't kidding about his face... talk about fivehead.Morkonan wrote: ↑Tue, 9. Apr 19, 15:03The man with the Most Punchable face in politics... His picture is in the dictionary under "Tool." If "condescending" had a face, his would be it. I've heard him talk a few times and there is an unmistakable sound of a thousand infants screaming if you listen very closely...RegisterMe wrote: ↑Tue, 9. Apr 19, 14:17I think we'll be hearing more of this chap. He's quite scary.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_M ... l_advisor)
The rumor-mill is running around saying he's one of the forces behind Trump cleaning house in DHS, etc. If there is someone that lies more than Trump, it's this guy. That's probably what Trump likes about him.
Morkonan wrote: ↑Mon, 8. Apr 19, 18:31
But, here's the thing that might really be of concern to you as a fairly strong Conservative - There are elements in the Democrat/Liberal caucus of power-movers that are pushing Biden's overly-enthusiastic-grandpa image "over the edge" on purpose, IMO. The accusations against Biden are, in my opinion, frivolous. It's not like he touched women on their "no-no spot" or manhandled them in a hallway or anything. Any rational, sane, observer would likely note he was expressing affection, camaraderie, etc... Like an "overly enthusiastic grandpa" rather than a "handsy Uncle."
- and a perfectly sane woman, like say Alexandria Ocasio Cortez or Elizabeth Warren, wouldn't stand a chance..Masterbagger wrote: ↑Wed, 10. Apr 19, 04:57Morkonan wrote: ↑Mon, 8. Apr 19, 18:31
But, here's the thing that might really be of concern to you as a fairly strong Conservative - There are elements in the Democrat/Liberal caucus of power-movers that are pushing Biden's overly-enthusiastic-grandpa image "over the edge" on purpose, IMO. The accusations against Biden are, in my opinion, frivolous. It's not like he touched women on their "no-no spot" or manhandled them in a hallway or anything. Any rational, sane, observer would likely note he was expressing affection, camaraderie, etc... Like an "overly enthusiastic grandpa" rather than a "handsy Uncle."
Democrats are not my circus and not my monkeys. For what it's worth I don't think Biden will be their nominee. They would have to back away from the extremism and the identity politics they have turned up to 11 to run him. Apart from the weird touchiness towards women and children he is unremarkable. It is going to take a total madman to have a chance to defeat President Trump in 2020.
Just so you know, Cortez isn't running and can't run, because she is too young. Warren probably won't get the nomination, because frankly, she is uninspiring.BugMeister wrote: ↑Wed, 10. Apr 19, 11:46- and a perfectly sane woman, like say Alexandria Ocasio Cortez or Elizabeth Warren, wouldn't stand a chance..
- I was arguing against the proposed scenario..Observe wrote: ↑Wed, 10. Apr 19, 16:46Just so you know, Cortez isn't running and can't run, because she is too young. Warren probably won't get the nomination, because frankly, she is uninspiring.BugMeister wrote: ↑Wed, 10. Apr 19, 11:46- and a perfectly sane woman, like say Alexandria Ocasio Cortez or Elizabeth Warren, wouldn't stand a chance..
But, no matter if one is traditionally a Republican or Democrat, we all want the "Best Choices Possible" running campaigns, right? That's the kicker... Being traditionally in favor of Republicans, I was extremely disappointed, in the extreme, with Trump as the nominee, especially versus Hillary. I was actually a bit surprised that Hillary got as much support as she did, even though I was more surprised that Trump won.Masterbagger wrote: ↑Wed, 10. Apr 19, 04:57Democrats are not my circus and not my monkeys. For what it's worth I don't think Biden will be their nominee. They would have to back away from the extremism and the identity politics they have turned up to 11 to run him. Apart from the weird touchiness towards women and children he is unremarkable. It is going to take a total madman to have a chance to defeat President Trump in 2020.
No, I am not expected to be rational in these things...I dislike judging people by their appearance. But, in my defense, this guy would have a very different sort of image if, in fact, he was a very different sort of person than he portrays himself to be... He is "that guy." He's the guy most likely to betray you when you sit down with others to play a game of "Risk." He's that one guy that always slowly creeps to Australia every_darn_time. He's that one guy that has "friends" who never smile when they're in his company... unless they're always talking about how much they screwed over someone else, then it's all laughs.
I'm not really at that point. If democrats want to go full socialist let them do it. Their endgame is going to involve presenting the American working class with a bill. The last time they did that with obamacare did not go so well for them. America has a way of correcting it's government back into the proper path. When you put emotions aside about how great your policies are you end up with convincing people who work hard for their money to part with it to pay for your schemes. Again, let the democrats demand whatever they like. If they want to do stuff that isn't in my best interest then they can go pound sand.Morkonan wrote: ↑Wed, 10. Apr 19, 20:20
But, no matter if one is traditionally a Republican or Democrat, we all want the "Best Choices Possible" running campaigns, right? That's the kicker... Being traditionally in favor of Republicans, I was extremely disappointed, in the extreme, with Trump as the nominee, especially versus Hillary. I was actually a bit surprised that Hillary got as much support as she did, even though I was more surprised that Trump won.
Let's say the Dems do what they want and nominate Sanders or a Sanders-Clone candidate. (I think there's too much pushback against Sanders via the whole Sanders/Clinton debacle, so cloning some of his platform is needed to grab his old support base.) What is then the possible outcome if it is revealed that Trump actually has eaten and survives by eating babies? If the outrage is palpable enough, then we could be looking at a Sanders-Clone in office.
That's why the nominee of the party that one doesn't like is important, overall. One doesn't have to necessarily dwell on it, but planning for the worst outcome can be helpful.
I haven't found much of anything that a politician has said is in my best interest to actually be "in my best interest." So, the scale for judging that is kinda bent no matter if it's Democrats or Republicans stating it.Masterbagger wrote: ↑Thu, 11. Apr 19, 03:59...If they want to do stuff that isn't in my best interest then they can go pound sand.
