RegisterMe wrote: ↑Fri, 19. Feb 21, 02:41
So you reckon the corrupt and incompetent Texas legislature will be voted out then? To be replaced by a (state) government not beholden to the energy industry? Maybe one that will hook up the Texan grid to the rest of the US, even though it would mean being beholden to Federal regulation?
I don't know? It will largely depend on how Texans themselves view about this no? Just because everyone (mostly liberal) think this is 100% the fault of Texas government, that doesn't mean Texans think the same. Tbh, it's not the view I share either. If you went to VN decades ago, build a house a stick a furnace in the house, no one would praise you for forsight, we would just think you're nut. The cold spell I mentioned may have give you some vindication, but that doesn't mean others can be accused of carelessness, even if some had to pay for it with their life. Like, don't get me wrong, if something like this happen in Colorado and we have mass power loss, some head will have to roll, but this is freaking Texas. Fukushima wasn't a natural disaster, but a man made disaster. But say if a tsunami hit New York resulting in mass life lost, and hindsight said most of that can be avoided if the government have the same contingency plan the Japan government does. I mean ... sure, but can you turn that into a fault of not having one for New York?
Point is - I don't believe this is politic, or you need politic to fix it. The current government can learn and fix it. If they let something like this happen "again", than that will be a different story, and I think even Texans would agree ... maybe. More on this later. @
In any sensible world Ted Cruz and Greg Abbott would resign immediately. In a marginally less sensible world they'd be voted out at the first opportunity.
I fear we don't live in a sensible world
.
We had 4 years of Trump*, after all said and done he still manage to get 70+ mil votes. In fact, it is my belief if COVID didn't happens, he would had completely trout it. That's enough to tell you the answer I think.
But let me bring up something else that I think we sometime forgot: and that is these days we focus too much on the shortcoming of the incumbent without realizing
Democracy may give people choice, but that itself doesn't mean much if it lacks better alternative.
Do you follow the current scandal of NY governor Cuomo about the nursing home crisis? It's not just Fox and conservative news, but even left leaning outlet are coming down pretty hard on him too. And frankly, if anyone is completely oblivious to who he is, the stuffs coming out make him sound just like a stereotype republican.
Turn out many people, including NYorkers themselves don't have a lot of high opinion about Cuomo, and the only reason he was considered a hero a few months ago was because he was locking horn with Trump. So I asked them so if you guys know Cuomo has always been a scum ... why keep voting for him then? The answer I got shouldn't surprise you: well, he's a scum but it's still better than voting for a republican! And I'm pretty sure after all this, you will get the same answer from some Texans ... just swap the "republican" with "democrat" and you have it for the first part of this post @
Which kinda bring back my original point: the problem is every damn things is political these days. And as long as people keep voting for the color rather than merit, I don't expect thing to get any better.
* The reason I kept mentioning Trump in the last few post wasn't because I want to, but just to trick the mods into thinking we actually stay on topic
. Kinda glad the healthcare part got splitted so it can be discussed without bringing him up.