Brexit

Anything not relating to the X-Universe games (general tech talk, other games...) belongs here. Please read the rules before posting.

Moderator: Moderators for English X Forum

User avatar
Ketraar
EGOSOFT
EGOSOFT
Posts: 11818
Joined: Fri, 21. May 04, 17:15
x4

Re: Brexit

Post by Ketraar » Mon, 8. Apr 19, 21:02

Observe wrote:
Mon, 8. Apr 19, 20:41
...vs. being able to act independently.
I keep reading this and I keep wonder what people mean by it? Did the UK amass its wealth independently? Did it make its scientific discoveries independently? Maybe its language was made on its own? I struggle to see the appeal of this need for being "independently", but I dont see people go out foraging, or produce their own cars, their own roads, their own phones...

Thus this notion that
...one could argue the citizens of the UK are blameless here for making their choice...
No, the people are the ones that have the responsibility, maybe no fully, but the main issue in my eyes is that people think its not and "the politicians" are to blame, we did nothing wrong. I agree, "you" did nothing, nothing to get informed, nothing to get involved in electing the right people, nothing to demand proper representation, "you" did nothing and now all are paying for it. So yes, mostly people are responsible, they define and shape the societies they live in and doing nothing does the shaping just as much, if not more.

MFG

Ketraar
Image

User avatar
Observe
Posts: 5079
Joined: Fri, 30. Dec 05, 17:47
xr

Re: Brexit

Post by Observe » Mon, 8. Apr 19, 22:01

Ketraar wrote:
Mon, 8. Apr 19, 21:02
Observe wrote:
Mon, 8. Apr 19, 20:41
...vs. being able to act independently.
I keep reading this and I keep wonder what people mean by it? Did the UK amass its wealth independently? Did it make its scientific discoveries independently? Maybe its language was made on its own? I struggle to see the appeal of this need for being "independently"...
Part of the reason you may wonder what people mean by it, is because it is a fictional story. It's a made up narrative that some people believe represents truth. We all have such narratives running through our minds constantly. Humans are story-tellers and we organize around our stories. Most of them are pure fantasy.

Golden_Gonads
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri, 13. Feb 04, 20:21
x3tc

Re: Brexit

Post by Golden_Gonads » Tue, 9. Apr 19, 03:49

Observe wrote:
Mon, 8. Apr 19, 20:41
Morkonan wrote:
Mon, 8. Apr 19, 18:08
...In that respect, one could argue the citizens of the UK are blameless here for making their choice...
In broad strokes, the decision was between nationalism and globalism. Between unity and separation. Between being subservient to foreign powers in the interest of the common good vs. being able to act independently. Everyone knew this. Sure, they didn't know the devil-in-the-details, but since this hasn't been done before, no one seemed to fully understand the complications involved.
I'd argue with the 'in the interest of the common good' part of your comment. The EU is corrupt and incompetent, I mean Farage is an MEP for Christ's sake!

Mightysword
Posts: 4350
Joined: Wed, 10. Mar 04, 05:11
x3tc

Re: Brexit

Post by Mightysword » Tue, 9. Apr 19, 06:35

Morkonan wrote:
Mon, 8. Apr 19, 18:08
I suppose I could expand it to be applicable: If you force people to choose one of two choices but don't tell them the truthful consequences of either of them, they are innocent and blameless if one of those choices ends up causing harm. In that respect, one could argue the citizens of the UK are blameless here for making their choice ...
Only if you're talking about kids, sure. If an adult tricked and scam a 5 years old out his sweetroll, then sure I'll agree. But don't kid yourself here, 52% of UK voters voted to leave in the biggest turn out in history, while it may very well be "some" was misinformed, it would be outright denial to say none of them know what they were doing. We're talking about Adults in full command of their faculties, professionals that are probably more informed on the issues than all of us here among those 52%. If I were to be an upstanding UK citizen who voted leave, upon the assumption you're suggesting I can only see two conclusion: I voted knowing what I'm doing even though it turned out to be a mess, or I were naive and got tricked. Between those two I'm not sure which is the worse insult ... Remember how I was pretty dismissal of whole "Russian influence and collusion" from the get go right after Trump got into office? It wasn't because I support Trump, but as I said back then I would much prefer to believe American voters voted for a bad president by their own will rather than being an bunch of idiots who don't know what the hell they voted for. I find it's amazing people tried to use Russian as an excuse to absolves themselves from their responsibility as the voters - and maybe it does a little bit - but by doing that I feel they inflicted greater insult on themselves. :sceptic:

Shooting your own foot is bad enough, but it would be even worse if the reason you shot yourself in the foot because someone told you "just try to shoot yourself in the foot, it actually feels good!" and you actually freaking believe it. :roll:
Reading comprehension is hard.
Reading with prejudice makes comprehension harder.

pjknibbs
Posts: 41359
Joined: Wed, 6. Nov 02, 20:31
x4

Re: Brexit

Post by pjknibbs » Tue, 9. Apr 19, 08:07

Golden_Gonads wrote:
Tue, 9. Apr 19, 03:49
The EU is corrupt and incompetent, I mean Farage is an MEP for Christ's sake!
He was elected to that position, same way any of our MPs are produced. I mean, I could just as easily say that the UK Parliament is corrupt and incompetent--I mean, Boris Johnson is an MP for Christ's sake!

User avatar
BugMeister
Posts: 13647
Joined: Thu, 15. Jul 04, 04:41
x4

Re: Brexit

Post by BugMeister » Tue, 9. Apr 19, 09:17

our MP's are all bred from the finest stock..
from hive-pods, at a special incubation centre called The Garden of Eton..

wake up, Freeman..
wake up and smell the ashes.. :lol:
- the whole universe is running in BETA mode - we're working on it.. beep..!! :D :thumb_up:

User avatar
Morkonan
Posts: 10113
Joined: Sun, 25. Sep 11, 04:33
x3tc

Re: Brexit

Post by Morkonan » Tue, 9. Apr 19, 14:39

Mightysword wrote:
Tue, 9. Apr 19, 06:35
Only if you're talking about kids, sure. If an adult tricked and scam a 5 years old out his sweetroll, then sure I'll agree. But don't kid yourself here, 52% of UK voters voted to leave in the biggest turn out in history, while it may very well be "some" was misinformed, it would be outright denial to say none of them know what they were doing. We're talking about Adults in full command of their faculties, professionals that are probably more informed on the issues than all of us here among those 52%....
They were all "professionals?"

Most people pay strict attention to what is right in front of their face at any one time and a little less attention on what is in their back yard. Other than that, many will dedicate a few minutes to something, formulate an opinion, and then they're done. So, John and Jane Q. Public work 50+ hours a week, raising two kids, have a house payment, share a car, and are getting ready to send one of their kids off to school soon. At home, they spend about twenty minutes together as a family each weeknight. Once a month or so, they might all go out to see a movie or watch a show on television together. After the kids go to bed, they might have some sexy-time if they're not already asleep or it isn't laundry-night. Whenever there's an "event" like Brexit going on, they might watch the news here and there and talk about it at work. But, they tend to avoid that except with certain people who they agree with, since talking about politics at work with people who don't agree with one's point of view can lead to long-term working relationship problems. They discuss how they're going to vote, read a few articles online and discuss things with relatives and friends on Facebook. They decide their relatives are stoopid and the only friend that agrees with them is someone they haven't seen in fifteen years.

Then, they go vote and argue about it when one tells the other they voted differently.

There ya go.

Ever talked to someone about something complicate and watched as their eyes glazed over? Sure you have. It's not that their dumb or incompetent, it's just that they don't have the attention, time or willingness to sit through and listen to a bunch of complex crap that they don't need to know since they feel they already know all they need to. And, then they push the Big Red Button anyway and shut down the whole friggin' facility because they fell asleep during the safety vids...

Normal people. Decent people. People working hard, raising a family, doing "living stuffs" get distracted very easily and are very grateful when someone online takes the time to summarize everything for them in easy to understand terms like "This sucks, you should/shouldn't do it." Wonderful! Concise! Decision made, move on with life.
Observe wrote:
Mon, 8. Apr 19, 20:41
Morkonan wrote:
Mon, 8. Apr 19, 18:08
...In that respect, one could argue the citizens of the UK are blameless here for making their choice...
In broad strokes, the decision was between nationalism and globalism. Between unity and separation. Between being subservient to foreign powers in the interest of the common good vs. being able to act independently. Everyone knew this. Sure, they didn't know the devil-in-the-details, but since this hasn't been done before, no one seemed to fully understand the complications involved.
That's what the choice "became." That's what it was turned into.

And, notice how you phrase it. The "good choice" is not being "subservient." Great... If you sign a treaty with another nation are you then "subservient" or have you just entered into a mutually beneficial "agreement?" You might even give up something in order to get something you want. Is that being "subservient?" It that sort of sensationalism that colored this referendum and rendered the more complex issues little more than a byline as people sat around and screamed "Freedom" vs "Slavery."

CBJ
EGOSOFT
EGOSOFT
Posts: 51914
Joined: Tue, 29. Apr 03, 00:56
x4

Re: Brexit

Post by CBJ » Tue, 9. Apr 19, 16:11

Mightysword wrote:
Tue, 9. Apr 19, 06:35
We're talking about Adults in full command of their faculties, professionals that are probably more informed on the issues than all of us here among those 52%.
I don't think you've been reading this thread. Adults in full command of their facilities, yes, but "professionals" is stretching things (simply because the proportion of people who fits into that category is small), and "more informed on the issues than all of us" is an patently false. And just to reiterate, that applies to most of the people who voted to remain as well.
greypanther wrote:
Sun, 7. Apr 19, 21:59
( Also there is toooo much " ghosting! )
Is that a dig at me for failing to respond to this?
greypanther wrote:
Wed, 27. Mar 19, 13:01
How would you describe a group of countries that have a unified court system; a unified monetary system; a unified parliament and very probably, soon, a unified military? Sounds a bit like a federation of states similar to the way the USA is set up, unless I am missing something. Indeed a USE in all but name and a little more work needed. I would suggest that it is not I who is being false here...
I didn't respond to it because it's a straw-man. We don't have any of those things, so how I'd describe that situation is neither here nor there. I don't consider you "obnoxious" or "stupid" or any of the other things you suggested, but I don't see any point in engaging in a discussion that is based on a premise that I don't even recognise. It's pointless; neither of us are going to convince each other of anything.

Mightysword
Posts: 4350
Joined: Wed, 10. Mar 04, 05:11
x3tc

Re: Brexit

Post by Mightysword » Tue, 9. Apr 19, 16:31

Morkonan wrote:
Tue, 9. Apr 19, 14:39
They were all "professionals?"

Most people pay strict attention to what is right in front of their face at any one time and a little less attention on what is in their back yard. Other than that, many will dedicate a few minutes to something, formulate an opinion, and then they're done. So, John and Jane Q. Public work 50+ hours a week, raising two kids, have a house payment, share a car, and are getting ready to send one of their kids off to school soon. At home, they spend about twenty minutes together as a family each weeknight. Once a month or so, they might all go out to see a movie or watch a show on television together. After the kids go to bed, they might have some sexy-time if they're not already asleep or it isn't laundry-night. Whenever there's an "event" like Brexit going on, they might watch the news here and there and talk about it at work. But, they tend to avoid that except with certain people who they agree with, since talking about politics at work with people who don't agree with one's point of view can lead to long-term working relationship problems. They discuss how they're going to vote, read a few articles online and discuss things with relatives and friends on Facebook. They decide their relatives are stoopid and the only friend that agrees with them is someone they haven't seen in fifteen years.

Then, they go vote and argue about it when one tells the other they voted differently.

There ya go.

Ever talked to someone about something complicate and watched as their eyes glazed over? Sure you have. It's not that their dumb or incompetent, it's just that they don't have the attention, time or willingness to sit through and listen to a bunch of complex crap that they don't need to know since they feel they already know all they need to. And, then they push the Big Red Button anyway and shut down the whole friggin' facility because they fell asleep during the safety vids...

Normal people. Decent people. People working hard, raising a family, doing "living stuffs" get distracted very easily and are very grateful when someone online takes the time to summarize everything for them in easy to understand terms like "This sucks, you should/shouldn't do it." Wonderful! Concise! Decision made, move on with life.
Eh ... am I supposed to accept any of that as "excuses" and say "yeah, they're not responsible for their own vote"? Most people do it doesn't make it acceptable or right. In fact, I believe the global political situation would definitely be a better shape if voters are more critical and put more thought into their vote instead of just going with whatever they want to hear. What you said doesn't make the issue a none-problem, it'll just make it a widespread problem. And no, it's nowhere as hard to do as you make it out to be, if people actually want to take responsible for their vote. I see people scrutinize, double/tripple check everything coming out of Trump's mouth and I have no problem with that. It shows that people can be critical. But it would be great if they also apply the same approach to all the anti-Trump pieces as well, rather jumping headfirst believing any anti-Trump sentiment, forget about fact check, people believe it even before finish reading the sentence. It shows people are only critical "if they want to", and that is "their fault".

Sure, I won't argue that media are full of bias and misleading information that it's necessary for you to put more thought to not be misinformed. But that's also largely depend on how you approach the media, there are 2 modes:

- Are you reading the news seeking to be informed?
or
- Are you reading the news to seek agreement?

IMO things like Brexit happened because too many approach the news in the latter mode rather then the first mode. To borrow a saying of someone else on here, yes the politicians lied and tried to sell a unicorn, but precisely because it was a Unicorn that it is also people own's fault to believe the Unicorn exist. After all it's not like they're trying to buy a chicken.
Reading comprehension is hard.
Reading with prejudice makes comprehension harder.

User avatar
Observe
Posts: 5079
Joined: Fri, 30. Dec 05, 17:47
xr

Re: Brexit

Post by Observe » Tue, 9. Apr 19, 17:04

Mightysword wrote:
Tue, 9. Apr 19, 16:31
Are you reading the news seeking to be informed? or Are you reading the news to seek agreement?
Naturally, people want to feel good, right and powerful. Those are the things people seek when they read the news or walk out the door. Reality and truth are secondary. People will move away from things that are unpleasant and gravitate toward pleasure.

That's how most people approach their exposure to news. That's why some people turn to Fox and others to CNN. Those are the places they get their ammunition for the day, to fire against those they disagree with.

With imaginary things such as politics, It is very difficult to "be informed", without some bias or other being presented.

Even real events such as the occurrence of a tsunami, will often be reported with the taint of some slant - such as "the death toll would have been less, if the socialist government hadn't kicked out the dike builders".

User avatar
Red-Spot
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed, 9. Jan 19, 10:22
x3ap

Re: Brexit

Post by Red-Spot » Tue, 9. Apr 19, 18:32

Do I have to read the full topic before I am allowed to post here? :)

Ketraar wrote:
Mon, 8. Apr 19, 21:02
Observe wrote:
Mon, 8. Apr 19, 20:41
...vs. being able to act independently.
I keep reading this and I keep wonder what people mean by it? Did the UK amass its wealth independently? Did it make its scientific discoveries independently? Maybe its language was made on its own? I struggle to see the appeal of this need for being "independently", but I dont see people go out foraging, or produce their own cars, their own roads, their own phones...

Thus this notion that
...one could argue the citizens of the UK are blameless here for making their choice...
No, the people are the ones that have the responsibility, maybe no fully, but the main issue in my eyes is that people think its not and "the politicians" are to blame, we did nothing wrong. I agree, "you" did nothing, nothing to get informed, nothing to get involved in electing the right people, nothing to demand proper representation, "you" did nothing and now all are paying for it. So yes, mostly people are responsible, they define and shape the societies they live in and doing nothing does the shaping just as much, if not more.
That is pretty much how I think about it.

I personally feel the UK has created its own EU-doom by making themselves 'special' within the EU. It backfired and the EU was blamed for it. In effect the UK payed twice for the EU, firstly cause the EU does cost a lot, secondly cause they had to keep their own coin which has been failing miserably since the introduction of the Euro-coin.
I understand the frustration it may trigger, but it is not the EU that is to be blamed here. Just look at how long it has taken the UK to actually do something with their position.
The only decent think that happened in the UK regarding the brexit is that is was up to a vote. You can not go more democratic than that, kudos to them for that. From there on I personally am done with the UK/brexit. Leave or stay, those are the choices and you have 3 more days to decide. Not 'leave with all sorts of benefits' as the UK is trying to push for now. Make your decision, be a full member of the EU, or put a fence around your island.
'Ignoramus et ignorabimus'

Mightysword
Posts: 4350
Joined: Wed, 10. Mar 04, 05:11
x3tc

Re: Brexit

Post by Mightysword » Tue, 9. Apr 19, 23:52

CBJ wrote:
Tue, 9. Apr 19, 16:11
I don't think you've been reading this thread. Adults in full command of their facilities, yes, but "professionals" is stretching things (simply because the proportion of people who fits into that category is small), and "more informed on the issues than all of us" is an patently false. And just to reiterate, that applies to most of the people who voted to remain as well.
I should clarify what I meant by professionals here. I didn't meant it to be taken as "expert on the subject matter". The UK is a developed country, I had heard it has a good education system (at least better than the US), and you have free access to free media platforms. To put it bluntly: it's not a country full of illiterates with a tightly controlled state run only media. I would like to think the UK people for the most part have the capacity and the mean to make a fully informed decision ... if they decide to do so. After all, who among us here is an "expert" on the subject matter? Anyone here a career economist or lawyer or have at least have formal education on the subject? So what is the differences between those of you who claimed to see through the lie, and those who you claim fell for such lie? I don't think it's patently false either, or are you saying in that 52% (almost 17.5 million votes) there are not at least some segments that are more informed on the issues than all of us here? That would be thinking ... unnecessarily high about ourselves don't you think? :doh:

Note that the focus here is I'm rejecting this specific notion:
Morkonan wrote:
Mon, 8. Apr 19, 18:08
...In that respect, one could argue the citizens of the UK are blameless here for making their choice...
That excuse may pass for the people who live in a country like North Korea, but not a place like the UK.

Again, I'm not denying the UK electorate was lied to. But I don't think that absolved them the responsibility of their vote, they maybe the victim, but they are also their own victim. And yes I have been following thread and actively participate, enough to note that occasionally there are people asserted that they voted Leave wasn't because they were tricked or misinformed, but because they truly believe in the cause. If thing turns out badly, then you can accuse them of "making a bad judgement", and they have to own up to that responsibility. But telling them "you made a bad vote because you were tricked" is a different, and more likely a greater insult. :)
Last edited by Mightysword on Wed, 10. Apr 19, 00:39, edited 1 time in total.
Reading comprehension is hard.
Reading with prejudice makes comprehension harder.

Mightysword
Posts: 4350
Joined: Wed, 10. Mar 04, 05:11
x3tc

Re: Brexit

Post by Mightysword » Wed, 10. Apr 19, 00:37

Observe wrote:
Tue, 9. Apr 19, 17:04
That's how most people approach their exposure to news. That's why some people turn to Fox and others to CNN. Those are the places they get their ammunition for the day, to fire against those they disagree with.
My country only had state run media when I was there with strictly controlled and full blast on propaganda, it was one of the reason why my family decided to leave. After arriving in the US I thought we finally got free of "propaganda". It took me about a decade living here to realize I didn't escape it, in fact it felts like I avoided a sedan just to find myself in front of a truck. In term of both quantity and quality, the propaganda machine in the US has my country beat on every levesl. What makes a difference is here I at least have the option WHICH propaganda I want to believe. Or I can also choose not to believe any of them, and use the tools available at my disposal to find my own answer, tools otherwise would not be available in a dictatorial country.

It seems that even living in the freedom land, the "access to accurate and truthful information" is not an entitled right that I can take for granted. I have to put in effort to exercise that right. You are given the choice to have it, but it's not giving to you for free. The point is it doesn't matter if a person live in the US or the UK or any other democratic country, if they don't exert the effort for accurate information and just go with whatever they're comfortable with, than they are no less ignorant than the one who lives in a country like North Korea, and that is by their choice. :)
Reading comprehension is hard.
Reading with prejudice makes comprehension harder.

User avatar
BugMeister
Posts: 13647
Joined: Thu, 15. Jul 04, 04:41
x4

Re: Brexit

Post by BugMeister » Wed, 10. Apr 19, 11:36

Observe wrote:
Tue, 9. Apr 19, 17:04
Mightysword wrote:
Tue, 9. Apr 19, 16:31
Are you reading the news seeking to be informed? or Are you reading the news to seek agreement?
Naturally, people want to feel good, right and powerful. Those are the things people seek when they read the news or walk out the door. Reality and truth are secondary. People will move away from things that are unpleasant and gravitate toward pleasure.

That's how most people approach their exposure to news. That's why some people turn to Fox and others to CNN. Those are the places they get their ammunition for the day, to fire against those they disagree with.

With imaginary things such as politics, It is very difficult to "be informed", without some bias or other being presented.

Even real events such as the occurrence of a tsunami, will often be reported with the taint of some slant - such as "the death toll would have been less, if the socialist government hadn't kicked out the dike builders".
- fake press?
- been there, done that.. :roll:
https://historycompany.co.uk/2012/01/25 ... never-was/

- went down like a Led Zeppelin.. :lol:
- the whole universe is running in BETA mode - we're working on it.. beep..!! :D :thumb_up:

Redvers Ganderpoke
Posts: 1900
Joined: Tue, 11. Sep 07, 12:38

Re: Brexit

Post by Redvers Ganderpoke » Wed, 10. Apr 19, 11:41

pjknibbs wrote:
Tue, 9. Apr 19, 08:07
Golden_Gonads wrote:
Tue, 9. Apr 19, 03:49
The EU is corrupt and incompetent, I mean Farage is an MEP for Christ's sake!
He was elected to that position, same way any of our MPs are produced. I mean, I could just as easily say that the UK Parliament is corrupt and incompetent--I mean, Boris Johnson is an MP for Christ's sake!
MEPs aren't elected the same as MPs. The way MEPs are elected involves lists drawn up by the parties (very hard to be an independent MEP btw) and then seats allocated off the lists on the number of votes received for that party.
A flower?

CBJ
EGOSOFT
EGOSOFT
Posts: 51914
Joined: Tue, 29. Apr 03, 00:56
x4

Re: Brexit

Post by CBJ » Wed, 10. Apr 19, 14:49

Mightysword wrote:
Tue, 9. Apr 19, 23:52
I should clarify what I meant by professionals here. I didn't meant it to be taken as "expert on the subject matter". The UK is a developed country, I had heard it has a good education system (at least better than the US), and you have free access to free media platforms. To put it bluntly: it's not a country full of illiterates with a tightly controlled state run only media. I would like to think the UK people for the most part have the capacity and the mean to make a fully informed decision ... if they decide to do so. After all, who among us here is an "expert" on the subject matter? Anyone here a career economist or lawyer or have at least have formal education on the subject? So what is the differences between those of you who claimed to see through the lie, and those who you claim fell for such lie? I don't think it's patently false either, or are you saying in that 52% (almost 17.5 million votes) there are not at least some segments that are more informed on the issues than all of us here? That would be thinking ... unnecessarily high about ourselves don't you think? :doh:
Maybe this is a language thing, but a "professional" generally refers to someone who is doing a white-collar job. You can also describe someone as "professional" if they do their chosen work particularly well. Neither term can really be used to refer to the majority of people. The same goes for your point about people being informed. I acknowledged in an earlier reply to RegisterMe that it would be hyperbole to say that nobody really understood the situation, but I don't think it's exaggerating to suggest that the majority of the population didn't really have a clear understanding of the issues, and that many of those who thought they did were either mistaken or actively deceived.
Mightysword wrote:
Tue, 9. Apr 19, 23:52
Note that the focus here is I'm rejecting this specific notion:
Morkonan wrote:
Mon, 8. Apr 19, 18:08
...In that respect, one could argue the citizens of the UK are blameless here for making their choice...
That excuse may pass for the people who live in a country like North Korea, but not a place like the UK.
I'm not going to disagree with your point, because it is true that responsible adults in a free country have a duty to educate themselves on topics they are asked to vote for. However, the reality is that many people vote on the basis of their preconceived ideas, or on the basis of the campaigns that lead up to the vote. Given the fact that many of those preconceived ideas were formed from 40+ years of distortions and lies in the press, and that the campaigns were equally dishonest, it is hard not to lay the blame elsewhere. Where exactly were people supposed to get any real facts from, even if they wanted to? Do you really think that the average shop worker or bricklayer could be expected to go and research the economic impact of leaving the EU themselves? It's not a question of being "tricked", it's a question of there being no practical way to obtain genuine information, no way for them to determine the truth of the information that they were being presented, and no attempt made emphasise the importance of the decision being made on the basis of facts rather than a vague feeling that EU membership was a "good" or "bad" thing.

To put it in another context, if a school gets bad results, the pupils have to accept some responsibility, but the teachers have to shoulder the majority of the blame.

User avatar
Ketraar
EGOSOFT
EGOSOFT
Posts: 11818
Joined: Fri, 21. May 04, 17:15
x4

Re: Brexit

Post by Ketraar » Wed, 10. Apr 19, 15:12

CBJ wrote:
Wed, 10. Apr 19, 14:49
Do you really think that the average shop worker or bricklayer could be expected to go and research the economic impact of leaving the EU themselves? It's not a question of being "tricked", it's a question of there being no practical way to obtain genuine information,
They dont need to be in deep with economics, but I expect any adult to have SOME degree of ability to understand what they know and what not, then when faced with having to make any decision to get informed at least on the basics. I call BS on the "people cant be expected to educate themselves, bl bla..." this is just not true any more, there are plenty of ways to get information these days, if you want to. If you dont want, its ok, but that inaction does NOT excuse people from their responsibility, its a choice and as such will have consequences.

I recon if we look up the stats for how much time people spend watching nonsensical programs it will show that there is plenty of time that people COULD invest in scavenging for multiple sources of information to be somewhat informed. Here the old people at least have the excuse that they were actively brainwashed and coerced to have a specific mindset during the dictatorship, but that is also only really true for very old people. Yes there are forces that try to sell people stuff, some of it is bad, doesnt mean I'll buy everything, so yeah, people need to understand that they are in great part the culprits for how things are, pretty much anywhere without military juntas.

MFG

Ketraar
Image

RegisterMe
Posts: 8903
Joined: Sun, 14. Oct 07, 17:47
x4

Re: Brexit

Post by RegisterMe » Wed, 10. Apr 19, 15:22

Ketraar I don't disagree with that, but I do wonder whether people would have swallowed the Leave campaign's blandishments had it not been for two or three decades' worth of lies and anti-EU propaganda published in large swathes of the popular press (eg Daily Mail, Daily Express etc) in the UK.
I can't breathe.

- George Floyd, 25th May 2020

Bishop149
Posts: 7232
Joined: Fri, 9. Apr 04, 21:19
x3

Re: Brexit

Post by Bishop149 » Wed, 10. Apr 19, 15:46

A perfect example of the kind of BS we're dealing with:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1115926046858047488

2015: "The EU is bad but the single market is good, I'd suggest we leave the former not the latter."
2016: The UK votes to leave the EU, completely in accordance with the position above.
2019: "Well because of the referendum result my position has changed, it is clear we must leave the single market"

AAAARRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGHHHHHHH

This is pretty much emblematic of the entire Brexiteer position since 2016, they've been given an inch and are proceeding to take a mile. . . . . all whilst claiming it's "The will of the people".
Asshats
Last edited by Bishop149 on Wed, 10. Apr 19, 15:49, edited 1 time in total.
"Shoot for the Moon. If you miss, you'll end up co-orbiting the Sun alongside Earth, living out your days alone in the void within sight of the lush, welcoming home you left behind." - XKCD

User avatar
Ketraar
EGOSOFT
EGOSOFT
Posts: 11818
Joined: Fri, 21. May 04, 17:15
x4

Re: Brexit

Post by Ketraar » Wed, 10. Apr 19, 15:48

I'm not dismissing anyone else's responsibility, the media included. I just keep trying to remind people that they DO have agency and democracy allows them to choose to do nothing if they wish. What I think most people dont realize is that both have consequences (I know I'm repeating myself here, but it is crucial). Eventually, people are also somewhat responsible for the daily mail too, SOMEONE had to read it for it to have the reach it got. Eventually we realize that people can act against the things they find is wrong, get up and change it. And no, "its not worth the trouble" or "its hard" are not a valid excuses.

MFG

Ketraar
Image

Post Reply

Return to “Off Topic English”