Chips wrote:#ChipsIsInnocent
You are, and I apologize.
The Real Chips This Time wrote:It's really easy to say "equality between sexes is a good thing".
Not to those educated in the perversions of justice past and present done in the name of "equality".
"Equality" as in "the burden of proof is equally on the defendant" (which of course Feminists in practice exceed; ref: Duke Lacrosse) is tyranny.
The Suffragettes believed in a good kind of equality, the equal right of women and men to vote, but Susan B. Anthony never marched for the cause of castration without waiting for an investigation nor demanded accusations be treated as proof of guilt.
The word "Equality" has been used to so gruesomely pervert justice in so many ways -- not just by Feminists but unjust ideologues throughout history -- it should be seen as suspect, a red flag, until the details are revealed. In the case of Feminism the revelations of Duke Lacrosse, Phi Kappa Psi, Paul Nungesser, and a whole host of innocent men railroaded by campus kangaroo courts justify the skepticism.
The correct answer to any question beginning with, "Do you believe in the equality of ..." is, "Show me what you mean by 'equality'."
Show me, don't tell me,
show me.
Or even a small handful of cases.
Yeah, who cares about those guys, right? You're
Feminists.
Horrifying as this attitude is it's based on a false assumption. On campuses all across America (and Britain too from what I've read) Feminist kangaroo courts are the rule, not the exception. Betsy DeVos is changing that, slowly, but it will take a long time before real justice finally defeats Feminist Social Justice. In the meantime those of us who know the truth about Feminism must continue to teach it.
based upon a tiny tiny tiny minority
How many Feminists called for due process and rejected the calls for castration within, say, a month of the Group of 88 endorsing the Potbangers to howls of applause from Feminists online, in print, and especially in academia?
A few dissidents like Camille Paglia criticized the rush to judgment a few years later. Where, I wonder, were these "majority of Feminists" of whom you speak opposing rather than endorsing the Group of 88, the Potbangers, and their grisly sentence?
fiksal wrote:... as an engineer ...
... shouldn't you be guided by
evidence of what a thing is?
I'm at war with what Feminists call "equality" because judged on its expression it is injustice, but of course as you've already stated multiple times you're ignoring the evidence as it is in your words "boring".
... the ones who try painting it with that brush would still do it if that case did not exist ...
From willful ignorance to the unpersoning of Paul Nungesser? Then a pivot to an attack on my character for daring to bring him up. How typically Feminist.
The point isn't an innocent man railroaded and falsely accused
by a Senator but speculation over whether I would complain even if he'd been treated fairly. I guess we'll just never know ... but consider the possibility that Paul Nungesser's case is both bigger than and not about
me.
CBJ wrote:This thread seems to have been started as flamebait ... Trump ...
I didn't imagine GamerGate would be so controversial among gamers, especially a game as freewheeling as the X-Series, with Brett high on spaceweed admiring Saya Kho's spacesuit and Julian's Pirate Lover demanding to be treated like a woman and the Boob Window fashion critiques of the Skunk's flashy co-pilot. Sarkeesian would nuke the X Series from orbit.
I did expect a lot of anti-Trump flames, but I didn't vote for him so that was to be my defense and end the conversation. There's 500+ pages of Trump thread for crying out loud.
Things have not at all turned out as I expected them to.
