Link.Apple Inc has agreed to pay up to $500 million to settle litigation accusing it of quietly slowing down older iPhones as it launched new models, to induce owners to buy replacement phones or batteries.
I found this part interesting:
I don't believe that for a second, chances are they settled because a protracted legal battle would only attract more attention to the issue in the long run, with the potential for financial losses (a corporation's main concern). I'm reminded of another settlement that probably had the same underlying motive.Apple denied wrongdoing and settled the nationwide case to avoid the burdens and costs of litigation, court papers show.