Removed from Biden thread

[CaptainSim]

My theory is that to be in such high places, you have to come to compromise a lot. So, no US President (or any corporate super-manager, or high ranking politician around the world) will never be what normal people would call "a good person". Off course, there's the bad and the worse, but that's it.

Unless Democrats flood GA to flip the Senate. Then you can kiss compromise part goodbye. Yang already openly admitted he moved to GA for the election.
Beyond that point the will be no point in having any states or electoral college if averyone can move around to flip states without any limitation.
There should be some kind of minimal residence time limit, like one year to prevent it.

Edit: BTW Republicans could do the same, so it would be funny, if somehow GA would get a few milion new residents in January - totaly normal, nothing to see here

That's not realistic, either way. No sane person would want to move to GA just for the sake of maybe tipping an election. The weather sucks, traffic is a nightmare, especially around Atlanta, and it's full of rednecks and hillbillies. The only reason GA is even on the map is because of the airport in Atlanta. Even if they did, they deserve representation in congress just like everyone else and they're entitled to vote for their representative.

What's wrong with rednecks and hillbillies exactly, maybe they just want to get away from all the crazy trendsters and hipsters who just parrot what the media states and do not think for themselves... do you support imposing thousands upon thousands of regulations so that you can't run a business and conduct your own life as you see fit? Why would you want to subject yourself or others to that kind of leftist slavery?

[CaptainSim]

Mr. Yang is neither insane nor stupid: registration & residency requirements by state

As you can see, you do not have to be a resident to register to vote in Georgia.

Ok, so maybe not insane nor stupid , but can we at least agree it's dishonest? This is literally the definition of using loophole to game the system. I hope this is not a popular idea, otherwise it's the kinda of stuffs that fuel conspiracy. Sure, you can do it, but this is not something you do and expect the opposition to just sit there and take it. It's the kinda of action that will ensure countermeasure, and both will be bad for Democracy.

This is no longer the realm of conspiracy. The Trump Team (Giuliani) has produced HUNDREDS of signed affidavits (this is testimony under oath, under the penalty of perjury) proving Biden lost the election in the key swing states. Thousands of votes were altered. In the realm of the law, an affidavit is gold, it is proof and testimony, changing the weight and burden of evidence and shifting it to your side, unless the other side can produce opposing affidavits that contradict the affidavits you've produced, which also must be under penalty of perjury, a criminal felony.

Mainstream media, composed of journalists with bachelors and master's degrees instead of juris doctor degrees, betrays its own incredible ignorance when it tries to declare Trump has "no evidence". Affidavits are powerful evidence. Most evidence in a Court of law is testimonial in nature, and testimonial evidence is often more direct than physical evidence, which is often circumstantial.

[felter]

Mr. Yang is neither insane nor stupid: registration & residency requirements by state

As you can see, you do not have to be a resident to register to vote in Georgia.

Ok, so maybe not insane nor stupid , but can we at least agree it's dishonest? This is literally the definition of using loophole to game the system. I hope this is not a popular idea, otherwise it's the kinda of stuffs that fuel conspiracy. Sure, you can do it, but this is not something you do and expect the opposition to just sit there and take it. It's the kinda of action that will ensure countermeasure, and both will be bad for Democracy.

This is no longer the realm of conspiracy. The Trump Team (Giuliani) has produced HUNDREDS of signed affidavits (this is testimony under oath, under the penalty of perjury) proving Biden lost the election in the key swing states. Thousands of votes were altered. In the realm of the law, an affidavit is gold, it is proof and testimony, changing the weight and burden of evidence and shifting it to your side, unless the other side can produce opposing affidavits that contradict the affidavits you've produced, which also must be under penalty of perjury, a criminal felony.

Mainstream media, composed of journalists with bachelors and master's degrees instead of juris doctor degrees, betrays its own incredible ignorance when it tries to declare Trump has "no evidence". Affidavits are powerful evidence. Most evidence in a Court of law is testimonial in nature, and testimonial evidence is often more direct than physical evidence, which is often circumstantial.

And he never once produced one of those so called affidavits in court, not one single one. The question is, if they are legitimate and not made up, why have they not been used in a court case and why have the FBI, the police, AG Barr and numerous others not been able to find these people who are making these claims, why have they suddenly come out of the hiding when their testimony doesn't mean anything, why did they not come forward earlier when their testimony could have been used in any of the multiple court cases. You are clutching at straws and you know it. Just out of interest, have you seen any of those so called affidavits, the only one I have seen was withdrawn when they were going to use it in court, as the guy behind it admitted he made it all up. Affidavits are only legit when they are used, they don't mean anything till then, there is no perjury till then and they can be withdrawn at anytime before being used as evidence. So please do tell us, why they have never been used in a court of law if they are legitimate.

[CaptainSim]

Ok, so maybe not insane nor stupid , but can we at least agree it's dishonest? This is literally the definition of using loophole to game the system. I hope this is not a popular idea, otherwise it's the kinda of stuffs that fuel conspiracy. Sure, you can do it, but this is not something you do and expect the opposition to just sit there and take it. It's the kinda of action that will ensure countermeasure, and both will be bad for Democracy.

This is no longer the realm of conspiracy. The Trump Team (Giuliani) has produced HUNDREDS of signed affidavits (this is testimony under oath, under the penalty of perjury) proving Biden lost the election in the key swing states. Thousands of votes were altered. In the realm of the law, an affidavit is gold, it is proof and testimony, changing the weight and burden of evidence and shifting it to your side, unless the other side can produce opposing affidavits that contradict the affidavits you've produced, which also must be under penalty of perjury, a criminal felony.

Mainstream media, composed of journalists with bachelors and master's degrees instead of juris doctor degrees, betrays its own incredible ignorance when it tries to declare Trump has "no evidence". Affidavits are powerful evidence. Most evidence in a Court of law is testimonial in nature, and testimonial evidence is often more direct than physical evidence, which is often circumstantial.

And he never once produced one of those so called affidavits in court, not one single one. The question is, if they are legitimate and not made up, why have they not been used in a court case and why have the FBI, the police, AG Barr and numerous others not been able to find these people who are making these claims, why have they suddenly come out of the hiding when their testimony doesn't mean anything, why did they not come forward earlier when their testimony could have been used in any of the multiple court cases. You are clutching at straws and you know it. Just out of interest, have you seen any of those so called affidavits, the only one I have seen was withdrawn when they were going to use it in court, as the guy behind it admitted he made it all up. Affidavits are only legit when they are used, they don't mean anything till then, there is no perjury till then and they can be withdrawn at anytime before being used as evidence. So please do tell us, why they have never been used in a court of law if they are legitimate.

They weren't used because the judges were afraid to even consider it. No one is willing to be the scapegoat and face the wrath of the lying leftist mainstream media. No judge wants to be known as "that guy" that actually stood for the truth. I've read through the affidavits. Numerous long presentations have been made in front of state legislatures. All of the cases are being dismissed on grounds they would NEVER be dismissed on if these were normal lawsuits that weren't so denigrated by the ignorant leftist press. Judges are afraid of the press, which is a shame, as it shows liberty has been eroded and there is no longer true judicial independence in the United States.

The judges in Pennsylvania, for example, dismissed the lawsuit due to standing and on very obscure deadlines that could have been legally disregarded for the sake of getting to the truth. The dismissal on grounds of standing is the most absurd thing I ever read from a court opinion (and I've read thousands). It really is sickening- to twist the law to try to make an argument that a candidate and the President doesn't have standing to contest an election! The judge in his opinion even admitted there might have indeed been a way to argue that Trump DID have standing, but since he didn't see any new argument, he wasn't going to sua sponte try to extend or make new law to allow for it, something judges do ALL THE TIME in other cases. In other words, he was too much of a coward. The Courts, cowered by the mob, didn't even want to TOUCH the evidence with a ten foot pole because they know how powerful it is, so they found other obscure ways to dismiss the cases. It really is a coup. I've never seen judicial decisions, especially from federal judges, THIS BAD.

The FBI, are you kidding me? You mean the FBI that is actively going after a few people who blocked roads in New Jersey on election day for Trump, but have done NOTHING against Antifa which organized to burn down entire cities in 2019? The FBI who declares that White people are the new terrorists? The FBI who did NOTHING when it came to all of the suspicious activity with Clinton and her e-mails but allowed an impeachment investigation to go on against Trump for YEARS, that ended up being shown as BASELESS and WITHOUT SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE to conclude any law was violated or any action could be taken, and from a dossier that had NO GROUNDING OR SUPPORT whatsoever? The FBI that immediately began SURVEILLING the Trump campaign without cause in 2016, but never lifted a finger against the other side? The FBI was hijacked by leftist bureaucrats years ago. It has nothing to do with justice anymore:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-horowitz ... 1577484412

[felter]

As I said you are clutching at straws, you cannot see the forest because of the trees in your way. A judge doesn't decide on what evidence is going to be used, they decide on the legality of that evidence and not once was any evidence provided in or out of court, apart from certain people saying they had evidence but never actually showing that evidence. All this evidence that you say they have, it's all made up fantasy to make fools of people into believing that they won when they didn't. A sore loser is a sore loser and Trump is a sore loser that is making a fool out of a large portion of America. You do realise Hilary Clinton lost that election back in 2016, and has nothing to do with the 2020 election. Honestly you need to get over Clinton, she is a nobody of importance. You are also calling people liars but defending a compulsive liar at the same time, one that has a serious problem with telling the truth. By the way where's your evidence, where are these so called affidavits and why did they not come forward weeks ago, you need to tell us that last part.

[CaptainSim]

As I said you are clutching at straws, you cannot see the forest because of the trees in your way. A judge doesn't decide on what evidence is going to be used, they decide on the legality of that evidence and not once was any evidence provided in or out of court, apart from certain people saying they had evidence but never actually showing that evidence. All this evidence that you say they have, it's all made up fantasy to make fools of people into believing that they won when they didn't. A sore loser is a sore loser and Trump is a sore loser that is making a fool out of a large portion of America. You do realise Hilary Clinton lost that election back in 2016, and has nothing to do with the 2020 election. Honestly you need to get over Clinton, she is a nobody of importance. You are also calling people liars but defending a compulsive liar at the same time, one that has a serious problem with telling the truth. By the way where's your evidence, where are these so called affidavits and why did they not come forward weeks ago, you need to tell us that last part.

You didn't address the points in my post. I stated the the judges never even LOOKED at the evidence. They never allowed it to be entered. They didn't want to look at it, because if they did, they would be forced to weigh the clear evidence against Biden.

The cases were dismissed on technicalities like "standing" before the massive amounts of evidence were even ABLE to be introduced... where have you been? Probably only watching MSM which censors half of what's going on? The judges were able to manipulate the rules easily in these cases because there are so few election fraud cases that are in existence, you can literally make up the case law as you go along. The judges didn't want to do ANYTHING for Trump to even allow the evidence to be looked at, because they were AFRAID of the wrath of the mob and more riots.

[Vertigo 7]

Unless Democrats flood GA to flip the Senate. Then you can kiss compromise part goodbye. Yang already openly admitted he moved to GA for the election.
Beyond that point the will be no point in having any states or electoral college if averyone can move around to flip states without any limitation.
There should be some kind of minimal residence time limit, like one year to prevent it.

Edit: BTW Republicans could do the same, so it would be funny, if somehow GA would get a few milion new residents in January - totaly normal, nothing to see here

That's not realistic, either way. No sane person would want to move to GA just for the sake of maybe tipping an election. The weather sucks, traffic is a nightmare, especially around Atlanta, and it's full of rednecks and hillbillies. The only reason GA is even on the map is because of the airport in Atlanta. Even if they did, they deserve representation in congress just like everyone else and they're entitled to vote for their representative.

What's wrong with rednecks and hillbillies exactly

Since you asked, they're not particularly bright and are pretty gullible. A good chunk of them are flagrantly racist. It's usually hillbillies that wave flags of enemy nations while shouting 'Murica! which just baffles the hell out of me; it certainly isn't patriotic whatever that is. An awful lot of them think they're soldiers just because they bought an assault rifle and they're just aching for a chance to use it. Need I go on?

do you support imposing thousands upon thousands of regulations so that you can't run a business and conduct your own life as you see fit? Why would you want to subject yourself or others to that kind of leftist slavery?

Woo, couple of crazy train things to break down there.

First off if you think regulations equate to slavery, your white privilege is showing as is your lack of understanding of what regulations do.

Regulations the US government imposes serve a myriad of purposes such as limiting monopolies, setting limits on pollution emissions, certifying food and drugs as safe for consumption, just for starters. The vast majority of the regulations serve to protect the consumer; that's you, fyi. Do you want toxic waste leeched into your drinking water? Do you want the cost of common goods like bread to skyrocket so that only the ultra wealthy can afford it? Do you want to eat tainted foods or take tainted drugs? Without regulating those industries, it would happen.

As I said you are clutching at straws, you cannot see the forest because of the trees in your way. A judge doesn't decide on what evidence is going to be used, they decide on the legality of that evidence and not once was any evidence provided in or out of court, apart from certain people saying they had evidence but never actually showing that evidence. All this evidence that you say they have, it's all made up fantasy to make fools of people into believing that they won when they didn't. A sore loser is a sore loser and Trump is a sore loser that is making a fool out of a large portion of America. You do realise Hilary Clinton lost that election back in 2016, and has nothing to do with the 2020 election. Honestly you need to get over Clinton, she is a nobody of importance. You are also calling people liars but defending a compulsive liar at the same time, one that has a serious problem with telling the truth. By the way where's your evidence, where are these so called affidavits and why did they not come forward weeks ago, you need to tell us that last part.

You didn't address the points in my post. I stated the the judges never even LOOKED at the evidence. They never allowed it to be entered. They didn't want to look at it, because if they did, they would be forced to weigh the clear evidence against Biden.

The cases were dismissed on technicalities like "standing" before the massive amounts of evidence were even ABLE to be introduced... where have you been? Probably only watching MSM which censors half of what's going on? The judges were able to manipulate the rules easily in these cases because there are so few election fraud cases that are in existence, you can literally make up the case law as you go along. The judges didn't want to do ANYTHING for Trump to even allow the evidence to be looked at, because they were AFRAID of the wrath of the mob and more riots.

Did you know that "standing" is the legal right to sue? And without standing, cases can't go forward? It seems to me that the super awesome mega lawyers that Trump had on his team should have been able to prove they had standing in the first place. Never mind the fact that an awful lot of these cases were dismissed by judges Trump himself nominated. And in the few cases where they did have standing, they didn't have evidence. So, again, whose fault is that?

If you wanna choose to believe some crayon scribbles on paper is "evidence", well, I hate it for ya, but every single person involved in investigating any claims of fraud found none that amounted to anything meaningful. No matter what you, Trump, Powell, Rudy Colludy, or any other "very stable genius" says, Trump lost both the popular vote and the electoral college. He's "president" for 18 more days and 8 hours as of this writing.

[felter]

As I said you are clutching at straws, you cannot see the forest because of the trees in your way. A judge doesn't decide on what evidence is going to be used, they decide on the legality of that evidence and not once was any evidence provided in or out of court, apart from certain people saying they had evidence but never actually showing that evidence. All this evidence that you say they have, it's all made up fantasy to make fools of people into believing that they won when they didn't. A sore loser is a sore loser and Trump is a sore loser that is making a fool out of a large portion of America. You do realise Hilary Clinton lost that election back in 2016, and has nothing to do with the 2020 election. Honestly you need to get over Clinton, she is a nobody of importance. You are also calling people liars but defending a compulsive liar at the same time, one that has a serious problem with telling the truth. By the way where's your evidence, where are these so called affidavits and why did they not come forward weeks ago, you need to tell us that last part.

You didn't address the points in my post. I stated the the judges never even LOOKED at the evidence. They never allowed it to be entered. They didn't want to look at it, because if they did, they would be forced to weigh the clear evidence against Biden.

The cases were dismissed on technicalities like "standing" before the massive amounts of evidence were even ABLE to be introduced... where have you been? Probably only watching MSM which censors half of what's going on? The judges were able to manipulate the rules easily in these cases because there are so few election fraud cases that are in existence, you can literally make up the case law as you go along. The judges didn't want to do ANYTHING for Trump to even allow the evidence to be looked at, because they were AFRAID of the wrath of the mob and more riots.

I did answer it, you just didn't want to see it. I said:

A judge doesn't decide on what evidence is going to be used, they decide on the legality of that evidence and not once was any evidence provided in or out of court,

There was one case where the Judge asked about these so called affidavits, the lawyers replied along the lines of, well a lot of them the had proven to be false so they threw them out, and the ones they were left with they could not prove they were false, so they thought they might be truthful but they couldn't prove that they were, so they couldn't use them. This because if they did and they were proven to be false, they would be in big trouble for using false or misleading evidence in a case. Now while Trump and his cohorts have no problems with telling lies, a lawyer doing so in a court of law in front of a judge is a career ending move, one that most lawyers are not willing to commit.

I'm going to presume you never knew about these things, as you probably only watch right wing media like newsmax, who have a tendency not to mention these types of things as it goes against what they are trying to say and have their viewers believe. They are pulling the wool over your eyes and making a fool of you in the process and you are lapping it all up. Biden won the election, fair and square, there are no missing ballots, there are no changed ballots, even the voter machines weren't fixed, it's all just made up fiction to please a lunatic that can't get over the fact that more people dislike him than like him.

[eladan]

...it's all just made up fiction to please a lunatic that can't get over the fact that more people dislike him than like him.

Just on this, I don't think it has anything to do with people liking him or not. I don't think he cares. It's about him losing at something. Trump doesn't lose (in his mind, at least.) Trump is someone who cheats at golf. To win. He's had a privileged upbringing where he probably always got his way. He continued that as an adult by, if anyone told him no, throwing lawyers at it until he changed it into a yes. I can easily believe that he thinks that there is no situation that he can't change into a win, if he throws enough lawyers at it.

Sorry about the O/T.

[CaptainSim]

As I said you are clutching at straws, you cannot see the forest because of the trees in your way. A judge doesn't decide on what evidence is going to be used, they decide on the legality of that evidence and not once was any evidence provided in or out of court, apart from certain people saying they had evidence but never actually showing that evidence. All this evidence that you say they have, it's all made up fantasy to make fools of people into believing that they won when they didn't. A sore loser is a sore loser and Trump is a sore loser that is making a fool out of a large portion of America. You do realise Hilary Clinton lost that election back in 2016, and has nothing to do with the 2020 election. Honestly you need to get over Clinton, she is a nobody of importance. You are also calling people liars but defending a compulsive liar at the same time, one that has a serious problem with telling the truth. By the way where's your evidence, where are these so called affidavits and why did they not come forward weeks ago, you need to tell us that last part.

You didn't address the points in my post. I stated the the judges never even LOOKED at the evidence. They never allowed it to be entered. They didn't want to look at it, because if they did, they would be forced to weigh the clear evidence against Biden.

The cases were dismissed on technicalities like "standing" before the massive amounts of evidence were even ABLE to be introduced... where have you been? Probably only watching MSM which censors half of what's going on? The judges were able to manipulate the rules easily in these cases because there are so few election fraud cases that are in existence, you can literally make up the case law as you go along. The judges didn't want to do ANYTHING for Trump to even allow the evidence to be looked at, because they were AFRAID of the wrath of the mob and more riots.

I did answer it, you just didn't want to see it. I said:

A judge doesn't decide on what evidence is going to be used, they decide on the legality of that evidence and not once was any evidence provided in or out of court,

There was one case where the Judge asked about these so called affidavits, the lawyers replied along the lines of, well a lot of them the had proven to be false so they threw them out, and the ones they were left with they could not prove they were false, so they thought they might be truthful but they couldn't prove that they were, so they couldn't use them. This because if they did and they were proven to be false, they would be in big trouble for using false or misleading evidence in a case. Now while Trump and his cohorts have no problems with telling lies, a lawyer doing so in a court of law in front of a judge is a career ending move, one that most lawyers are not willing to commit.

I'm going to presume you never knew about these things, as you probably only watch right wing media like newsmax, who have a tendency not to mention these types of things as it goes against what they are trying to say and have their viewers believe. They are pulling the wool over your eyes and making a fool of you in the process and you are lapping it all up. Biden won the election, fair and square, there are no missing ballots, there are no changed ballots, even the voter machines weren't fixed, it's all just made up fiction to please a lunatic that can't get over the fact that more people dislike him than like him.

There were hundreds of affidavits in dozens of cases in multiple states. No judge to my knowledge has even asked about the affidavits in the major cases. All the major cases were thrown out due to technicalities. If you want to cite to a particular case I'll review it, and I can cite to the many cases dismissed on purely technical grounds, where the judges actually try to argue that Trump and a candidate do not have standing to contest election results. Totally absurd.

[CaptainSim]

That's not realistic, either way. No sane person would want to move to GA just for the sake of maybe tipping an election. The weather sucks, traffic is a nightmare, especially around Atlanta, and it's full of rednecks and hillbillies. The only reason GA is even on the map is because of the airport in Atlanta. Even if they did, they deserve representation in congress just like everyone else and they're entitled to vote for their representative.

What's wrong with rednecks and hillbillies exactly

Since you asked, they're not particularly bright and are pretty gullible. A good chunk of them are flagrantly racist. It's usually hillbillies that wave flags of enemy nations while shouting 'Murica! which just baffles the hell out of me; it certainly isn't patriotic whatever that is. An awful lot of them think they're soldiers just because they bought an assault rifle and they're just aching for a chance to use it. Need I go on?

They're far more bright than the average negro democrat in the inner city in my experience. They understand that their freedoms and liberties have been threatened and that the average American has been reduced from a land that once held true values of liberty and godly honor, to nothing more than slavery to a bureaucratic class, that oversees virtually ever aspect of business operations (the day to day affairs of making a living). We could all give examples of stupidity on both the left and the right, but at least "hillbillies" are aware of the precarious state of the country and understand what's happening. Leftist hipsters are in utter denial at the decay of their society and desperately want popularity, so will go along with whatever conformity the wealthy establishment demands. They're the ones who hope to make from $100,000- $200,000 and get the slightly greater pittance from the elite than the rest get. The leftists on the dole in the ghetto (mostly negroes) could care less about politics and are less educated than the average hillbilly. This leaves the Democrat party to be run by the plutarchs, made up of the new globalists that hope to keep their wealth and status by regulating out of existence every competitive threat to their: business operations, banks, media conglomerates, and other state enforced regulatory monopolies and multinational corporations. Anyone who dares to go against their competitive position will soon face the wrath of teams of lobbyists and lawyers demanding new rules and regulations to DESTROY any hope of earning a livelihood in true freedom running your own business, as it was in America before 1900. As I warned on this board a year ago, they hate small businesses and anything that could compete against their position of dominance. They are now using the medical laws related to "Covid-19" to destroy over 60% of the small businesses in the country and prevent them from operating, while Amazon can do whatever it likes.

do you support imposing thousands upon thousands of regulations so that you can't run a business and conduct your own life as you see fit? Why would you want to subject yourself or others to that kind of leftist slavery?

Woo, couple of crazy train things to break down there.

First off if you think regulations equate to slavery, your white privilege is showing as is your lack of understanding of what regulations do.

White privilege? Are you kidding me? Don't you dare call me privileged. I earned my money and the liberty I have and I intend to continue doing so. Your arguments are pathetic. Just because you are incapable or unwilling to do what I do doesn't make me "privileged".

Regulations the US government imposes serve a myriad of purposes such as limiting monopolies, setting limits on pollution emissions, certifying food and drugs as safe for consumption, just for starters. The vast majority of the regulations serve to protect the consumer; that's you, fyi. Do you want toxic waste leeched into your drinking water? Do you want the cost of common goods like bread to skyrocket so that only the ultra wealthy can afford it? Do you want to eat tainted foods or take tainted drugs? Without regulating those industries, it would happen.

I definitely have swamp land in Florida to sell you boy! You honestly believe that most regulations are actually to benefit people? Are you kidding me? Granted, there are SOME regulations that serve a useful and legitimate purpose, but anyone who is honest and reviews the regulations in the United States since at least 1970 knows that most of them are useless additional rules, in order to force small businesses to hire teams of lawyers they can't afford, so that these same small businesses will never be able to truly establish themselves and compete against those in power. Do you honestly think for example the capital control regulations in the securities industry are necessary? They are nothing more than a barrier to entry to keep people from being creative to compete against the established banking class. If people are defrauded and damaged they can sue in court, there is no need to make it impossible to make a living! Wake up and stop being a slave. It is almost impossible to open any kind of factory in the United States any more.

[Vertigo 7]

Keep talking, you're only proving my point

[CaptainSim]

Keep talking, you're only proving my point

What's your point? That you are wiser than all your ancestors and that only what happened after 1965 is worthy of our consideration? Things have been getting worse not better. The longer this drags on the more you will be in desperate denial of the natural facts...

The rich have gotten richer, much richer than the rest of us, thanks to all your wonderful taxes and regulations that were supposed to "protect" us. You are probably a wage slave, as it is virtually impossible to start many many businesses or factories. You need often hundreds of millions of dollars to start businesses that, before your regulations, would have been only a few thousand dollars to start. It is also much harder to raise funds.

Meanwhile, humans continue to do what is natural, and segregate themselves based on race despite all unnatural attempts to integrate them. All you do is irritate people when you keep whining and demanding they integrate.

[Vertigo 7]

Keep talking, you're only proving my point

What's your point? That you are wiser than all your ancestors and that only what happened after 1965 is worthy of our consideration? Things have been getting worse not better. The longer this drags on the more you will be in desperate denial of the natural facts...

The rich have gotten richer, much richer than the rest of us, thanks to all your wonderful taxes and regulations that were supposed to "protect" us. You are probably a wage slave, as it is virtually impossible to start many many businesses or factories. You need often hundreds of millions of dollars to start businesses that, before your regulations, would have been only a few thousand dollars to start. It is also much harder to raise funds.

Meanwhile, humans continue to do what is natural, and segregate themselves based on race despite all unnatural attempts to integrate them. All you do is irritate people when you keep whining and demanding they integrate.

Here's a natural fact. You're an unnatural idiot. Being white doesn't make you any better or worse than anyone else of a different race. That's the thing that you are in desperate denial of. But being an ignorant racist little **** does make you worse than just about anyone out there.

You're seeking some kind of validation that you're somehow superior because you have pasty colored skin. I got news for you, that superiority didn't save your kind when the world kicked the shit out of the Nazis or when the US kicked the shit out of the Confederacy. All of that happened before 1965 and it wasn't done by just some white folks. And if you think that we're somehow worse off because of that, you're sadly, but unsurprisingly, mistaken.

I'm sorry if you feel that having other races around endangers your ability to hold a job or find suitable housing. Instead of blaming other people for your problems, you should see to your own shortcomings and try to better yourself.

[CaptainSim]

Keep talking, you're only proving my point

What's your point? That you are wiser than all your ancestors and that only what happened after 1965 is worthy of our consideration? Things have been getting worse not better. The longer this drags on the more you will be in desperate denial of the natural facts...

The rich have gotten richer, much richer than the rest of us, thanks to all your wonderful taxes and regulations that were supposed to "protect" us. You are probably a wage slave, as it is virtually impossible to start many many businesses or factories. You need often hundreds of millions of dollars to start businesses that, before your regulations, would have been only a few thousand dollars to start. It is also much harder to raise funds.

Meanwhile, humans continue to do what is natural, and segregate themselves based on race despite all unnatural attempts to integrate them. All you do is irritate people when you keep whining and demanding they integrate.

Here's a natural fact. You're an unnatural idiot. Being white doesn't make you any better or worse than anyone else of a different race. That's the thing that you are in desperate denial of. But being an ignorant racist little **** does make you worse than just about anyone out there.

My own hard work made me better off than most people out there, and will continue to. Being White was a contributing factor to my chances, since the median White IQ is higher than the average of other races. What race are you? Are you afraid to tell us? Out with your identity...

You're seeking some kind of validation that you're somehow superior because you have pasty colored skin.

That's hilarious. I don't seek any validation, I'm already validated. But keep thinking I need your validation or anyone else's.

I got news for you, that superiority didn't save your kind when the world kicked the shit out of the Nazis or when the US kicked the shit out of the Confederacy.

Whites were the ones who kicked the **** out of the Nazis. No one else was able to do it at the time. It was entirely White armies and militaries that invaded Nazi Germany.

All of that happened before 1965 and it wasn't done by just some white folks. And if you think that we're somehow worse off because of that, you're sadly, but unsurprisingly, mistaken.

I'm not advocating for National Socialism. I'm advocating for segregationism, something practiced in America long after Nazi Germany. In fact, it was practiced by ALL White nations, and is still practiced by ALL nonWhite nations. Do you see China allowing a massive immigration/invasion of White people? Of course not, they're not suicidal. Whites will definitely pick up the cause again (and in fact support has been drastically growing) as it continues to be clearer and clearer that your liberalism is an utter failure.

I'm sorry if you feel that having other races around endangers your ability to hold a job or find suitable housing. Instead of blaming other people for your problems, you should see to your own shortcomings and try to better yourself.

I'm more than wealthy. I'm just talking about the aesthetic and relaxed style of life when you are around only your own kind, which is your natural extended family. I also believe I could make even more money than I already do (I already make a decent amount), if I wasn't shackled by all your foolish regulations that nobody needs, and which have benefited practically NO ONE.

No non-White will ever feel enfranchised in an historical White nation. It is best for them to go back to their homelands. All your communism/liberalism leads to is riots and misery for all. My race has no obligation to take care of other races who refuse to care for themselves.

[Vertigo 7]

Wow, the arrogance you exude is astounding. Sorry little man, I'm not playing your game. You're nothing, and that's just something you'll have to come to terms with.

[CaptainSim]

Wow, the arrogance you exude is astounding. Sorry little man, I'm not playing your game. You're nothing, and that's just something you'll have to come to terms with.

Exactly, too afraid to provide us with your racial identity. No YOUR arrogance is astounding. If you think we are going to keep submitting to your stupid regulations, taxes, Pharisaical rules, and your dumb post-1965 system that is incredibly irritating and tyrannical, get ready for a wake up call. We don't need to be protected by you or people like you.

[Vertigo 7]

Wow, the arrogance you exude is astounding. Sorry little man, I'm not playing your game. You're nothing, and that's just something you'll have to come to terms with.

Exactly, too afraid to provide us with your racial identity. No YOUR arrogance is astounding. If you think we are going to keep submitting to your stupid regulations and your dumb post-1965 system that is incredibly irritating and tyrannical, get ready for a wake up call. We don't need to be protected by you or people like you.

The very fact that my race is somehow meaningful to this conversation shows how small you really are. And really... what makes you think I would lift a finger to protect you? I wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire. I'd point and laugh. I may even toss some gasoline on it, who knows?

[CaptainSim]

Wow, the arrogance you exude is astounding. Sorry little man, I'm not playing your game. You're nothing, and that's just something you'll have to come to terms with.

Exactly, too afraid to provide us with your racial identity. No YOUR arrogance is astounding. If you think we are going to keep submitting to your stupid regulations and your dumb post-1965 system that is incredibly irritating and tyrannical, get ready for a wake up call. We don't need to be protected by you or people like you.

The very fact that my race is somehow meaningful to this conversation shows how small you really are. And really... what makes you think I would lift a finger to protect you? I wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire. I'd point and laugh. I may even toss some gasoline on it, who knows?

At least you admit your philosophy, taxes, and endless rules aren't for our protection. We all want to know about you, we want to see what's behind your Communist-like agenda...

[Vertigo 7]

Exactly, too afraid to provide us with your racial identity. No YOUR arrogance is astounding. If you think we are going to keep submitting to your stupid regulations and your dumb post-1965 system that is incredibly irritating and tyrannical, get ready for a wake up call. We don't need to be protected by you or people like you.

The very fact that my race is somehow meaningful to this conversation shows how small you really are. And really... what makes you think I would lift a finger to protect you? I wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire. I'd point and laugh. I may even toss some gasoline on it, who knows?

At least you admit your philosophy isn't for our protection. We all want to know your race, we want to see what's behind your Communist-like agenda...

Who is we? You royalty, now? You're alone here, bucko.