Could someone tell me what difference it makes to load a text page vs loading the same page into arrays?
The arrays have a global scope and will remain.
Will the memory load be the same?
(After the initial script loses its scope, mind).
load text vs alloc array
Moderators: Moderators for English X Forum, Scripting / Modding Moderators
load text vs alloc array
TCAN TC/AP Artificial Life, Menudriven Automated Ship/Station Namer
Spex: i7 4790K@4Ghz 16Gb DDR3 GTX970Strix(4Gb)
X:R 454 Hours. 15 hours unmodded.
Spex: i7 4790K@4Ghz 16Gb DDR3 GTX970Strix(4Gb)
X:R 454 Hours. 15 hours unmodded.
Cool, thanks! Saves me a whole lot of work!
TCAN TC/AP Artificial Life, Menudriven Automated Ship/Station Namer
Spex: i7 4790K@4Ghz 16Gb DDR3 GTX970Strix(4Gb)
X:R 454 Hours. 15 hours unmodded.
Spex: i7 4790K@4Ghz 16Gb DDR3 GTX970Strix(4Gb)
X:R 454 Hours. 15 hours unmodded.
Still, it's that "insignificant" word that counts.
During the load process and moving to arrays.. 1+100 of them, will be more than double initially. Once the script loses its scope, it's back to the arrays only - that's assuming the loaded page indeed is unloaded.. which I'm a bit uncertain of.
If it keeps the page loaded, then I got my work set out for me after all.
101 ref pointers isn't all that much compared to the actual data included.
During the load process and moving to arrays.. 1+100 of them, will be more than double initially. Once the script loses its scope, it's back to the arrays only - that's assuming the loaded page indeed is unloaded.. which I'm a bit uncertain of.
If it keeps the page loaded, then I got my work set out for me after all.
101 ref pointers isn't all that much compared to the actual data included.
TCAN TC/AP Artificial Life, Menudriven Automated Ship/Station Namer
Spex: i7 4790K@4Ghz 16Gb DDR3 GTX970Strix(4Gb)
X:R 454 Hours. 15 hours unmodded.
Spex: i7 4790K@4Ghz 16Gb DDR3 GTX970Strix(4Gb)
X:R 454 Hours. 15 hours unmodded.