Why do Destroyer and Carrier Class ships look IDENTICAL......???
Moderator: Moderators for English X Forum
-
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Fri, 11. Nov 05, 05:59
Why do Destroyer and Carrier Class ships look IDENTICAL......???
Why is the ARGON ONE and the TITAN, exactly the same ship, visually.
Same goes for the other races..........
Should'nt a CARRIER Class ship have a HANGER BAY somewhere....???
Is there a CARRIER CLASS Model, for all races, hidden in the game files somewhere?
Is this something that can be addressed or added?
Same goes for the other races..........
Should'nt a CARRIER Class ship have a HANGER BAY somewhere....???
Is there a CARRIER CLASS Model, for all races, hidden in the game files somewhere?
Is this something that can be addressed or added?
Last edited by Charlie901 on Thu, 2. Feb 06, 18:20, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Thu, 19. Feb 04, 18:21
Try this link;
http://forum.egosoft.com/viewtopic.php?t=100641
There is an X3 pictorial size of all the capital class ships and their sizes. there are differences if you look at the M1 and M2's, and their stats are different while one can carry fighters, the other cannot. I cannot open that link but its there under ship stats.
http://forum.egosoft.com/viewtopic.php?t=100641
There is an X3 pictorial size of all the capital class ships and their sizes. there are differences if you look at the M1 and M2's, and their stats are different while one can carry fighters, the other cannot. I cannot open that link but its there under ship stats.
Time to get SPACED OUT!
2.93gHz processor, XFX 6800GS AGP 256-bit, 2 GB RAM, 19' TFT monitor
2.93gHz processor, XFX 6800GS AGP 256-bit, 2 GB RAM, 19' TFT monitor
-
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Thu, 19. Feb 04, 18:21
-
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Thu, 19. Feb 04, 18:21
Yeah, here is the correct one. Enjoy.stevio wrote:thats the wrong link it isn't in the tutorial thread. i think???
http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/1561/scaled9qc.jpg
Time to get SPACED OUT!
2.93gHz processor, XFX 6800GS AGP 256-bit, 2 GB RAM, 19' TFT monitor
2.93gHz processor, XFX 6800GS AGP 256-bit, 2 GB RAM, 19' TFT monitor
-
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Fri, 11. Nov 05, 05:59
Tooth wrote:Try this link;
http://forum.egosoft.com/viewtopic.php?t=100641
There is an X3 pictorial size of all the capital class ships and their sizes. there are differences if you look at the M1 and M2's, and their stats are different while one can carry fighters, the other cannot. I cannot open that link but its there under ship stats.
Nice link thanks!
It makes it easier to notice the subtle differences when they are to scale and side by side like that.
Re: Why do Destroyer and Carrier Class ships look IDENTICAL......???
Because they ARE the same ship--they're both carriers. If you'd compared the Titan to Argon One you might have had a point, but even then there are differences between the two.Charlie901 wrote:Why is the ARGON ONE and the COLLOSUS exactly the same ship, visually.
-
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Thu, 15. Dec 05, 11:13
-
- Posts: 352
- Joined: Sat, 12. Nov 05, 13:31
Heh, if you look at the Argon M1 side shot, you see that it has a HUGE space cannon built on top of it, from the looks of it it can turn 90 degree up and 180 to side.
And the Paranid TL and M1 are only missing Mast on top of them to make it perfect sailing boat for the borons. should they ever want to be on the water.
And as for the ships looking alike, what's the point in making 2 different hulls if you can make one that can be either carrier or destroyer, it costs credits to design ships doesn't it.
And the Paranid TL and M1 are only missing Mast on top of them to make it perfect sailing boat for the borons. should they ever want to be on the water.
And as for the ships looking alike, what's the point in making 2 different hulls if you can make one that can be either carrier or destroyer, it costs credits to design ships doesn't it.
-
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Thu, 19. Feb 04, 18:21
Tooth wrote:Yeah, here is the correct one. Enjoy.stevio wrote:thats the wrong link it isn't in the tutorial thread. i think???
http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/1561/scaled9qc.jpg
... zomg
Those ships are beautiful!
Ever thought of submitting this to the guy who does http://www.merzo.net ?
It'd be good to see how the X-Universe ships compare to the other universes!
Legitimate Businessman. Honest.
-
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Fri, 11. Nov 05, 05:59
-
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Fri, 11. Nov 05, 05:59
Re: Why do Destroyer and Carrier Class ships look IDENTICAL......???
DoH....!pjknibbs wrote:Because they ARE the same ship--they're both carriers. If you'd compared the Titan to Argon One you might have had a point, but even then there are differences between the two.Charlie901 wrote:Why is the ARGON ONE and the COLLOSUS exactly the same ship, visually.
That's what I meant.....I'm changing my original post now
Re: Why do Destroyer and Carrier Class ships look IDENTICAL......???
wait a min the carriers have a hanger bay the M2's dontCharlie901 wrote:Why is the ARGON ONE and the TITAN, exactly the same ship, visually.
Same goes for the other races..........
Should'nt a CARRIER Class ship have a HANGER BAY somewhere....???
Is there a CARRIER CLASS Model, for all races, hidden in the game files somewhere?
Is this something that can be addressed or added?
there is no model hidan that is the modal
thay use there ships and modefy the disinen for there needs
thats like saying why are all sea ships look the same coz thats the way we made them and thats the way thay work best
the argon have big powerfull
the spilt have short streamlined and meen looking
the boron look alive ships
the Teladi just a lot of junk and huge
the Paranid have war looking ships
there not exatily the same i know it looks like it at 1st but you see there is big things missing and added on and the shape and that changeds
you note that the M1's are biger more blucky then the M2's
and the TL's evan more so
sorry of any spelling mistakes
Only problem would be that the site is down.....Thalass wrote:Tooth wrote:Yeah, here is the correct one. Enjoy.stevio wrote:thats the wrong link it isn't in the tutorial thread. i think???
http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/1561/scaled9qc.jpg
... zomg
Those ships are beautiful!
Ever thought of submitting this to the guy who does http://www.merzo.net ?
It'd be good to see how the X-Universe ships compare to the other universes!
...
I dunno. I agree with the first guy.
The Destroyers and Carriers are almost visually identical, except for a line here or a hangar bay hammered on there.
Personally, I'd like for them to be visually obvious as to their purpose. They look like one hull design slightly altered. I know it's probably wrong to bring up 'real world' ships, but it is immediately obvious as to which ships are carriers and which are destroyers. Namely, the former has big runways (hangars) and the latter has more guns. I know this is a sci-fi/fantasy game, but you'd figure the hangars would be massive and obvious, something the ship is built around since that is its purpose. As it is, you have to struggle to visually ID the difference between, say, a Argon or Split M1 versus their same M2. If it didn't have the icon in the upper corner or tell you its name when clicked on, you'd really be in a bit of a bind.
But... it's not a major enough issue for me to worry about. I just hope they take it into account for X4.
The Destroyers and Carriers are almost visually identical, except for a line here or a hangar bay hammered on there.
Personally, I'd like for them to be visually obvious as to their purpose. They look like one hull design slightly altered. I know it's probably wrong to bring up 'real world' ships, but it is immediately obvious as to which ships are carriers and which are destroyers. Namely, the former has big runways (hangars) and the latter has more guns. I know this is a sci-fi/fantasy game, but you'd figure the hangars would be massive and obvious, something the ship is built around since that is its purpose. As it is, you have to struggle to visually ID the difference between, say, a Argon or Split M1 versus their same M2. If it didn't have the icon in the upper corner or tell you its name when clicked on, you'd really be in a bit of a bind.
But... it's not a major enough issue for me to worry about. I just hope they take it into account for X4.