M1 or M2 which?

General discussions about the games by Egosoft including X-BTF, XT, X², X³: Reunion, X³: Terran Conflict and X³: Albion Prelude.

Moderator: Moderators for English X Forum

hallegue
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri, 24. Aug 07, 21:40
x3

M1 or M2 which?

Post by hallegue » Mon, 28. Dec 09, 00:30

Hi there,
I have 66 ships including a Panther and a Demois fully loaded, and I want to get a ship to go to the Xenon sectors and kick some a??.
I have 166 millions and 37 PPCs and the necessary shields.
Can you guys tell me which should i buy???
Your comments will be really appreciated :?

tanner1ie
Posts: 596
Joined: Mon, 4. Sep 06, 19:47
x3tc

Post by tanner1ie » Mon, 28. Dec 09, 00:35

Short answer, buy both.
You'll find uses for both, though i'd say buy a Destroyer first as your Panther is already a capable carrier.
Ever dance with the devil by the pale moonlight?

AgamemnonArgon
Posts: 2758
Joined: Thu, 19. Nov 09, 22:12
x3tc

Post by AgamemnonArgon » Mon, 28. Dec 09, 00:39

Two choices, Boreas or (unsurprisingly) a Boreas. :D
I went into Dukes, with two Boreas and four Shrikes, and cleared the place out last week.
Getting the weapons is the problem. I don't own my own large heavy weapons complexes, so rely on the NPC stations. I keep ships on station just to buy the things as they appear.
Although, must admit, I have considered a Paranid destroyer, but don't want a third type on inventory (I own four Phoenix also).
Buy OTAS, you won't be disappointed.
Argon Patriot and Battlemaster
Peace - Through Superior Firepower

GaianKnight
Posts: 104
Joined: Fri, 14. Aug 09, 04:05
x3tc

Post by GaianKnight » Mon, 28. Dec 09, 00:40

Hope you have the rank too, for the ship you want.

So far, the Split Python (M2) and Raptor (M1) are my nasty faves. (Not including modding or such of course.) And actually, the Teladi Phoenix (M2) and Condor (M1) are my next vanilla choices. The Argon versions come next. Terran after, then Paranid and then Boron. (Course it's more like 1A then 1B then so on and all for me.)

Ship: GSS Valkyrie Knight (Apricot Vidasaurus)
Fighting Rank: Battlemaster
Trading Rank: Super-Magnate
Can I ***modified*** the ding dong weather too?

hallegue
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri, 24. Aug 07, 21:40
x3

Post by hallegue » Mon, 28. Dec 09, 00:53

Good point about the Panther, I was thinking about a Titan. the only thing I don't like is that is too slow only 49? The Boreas looks very rare and over price? And the Split ships the shield are weak. Any comments?
:?

User avatar
Deadbeat_Spinn
Posts: 6483
Joined: Wed, 19. Nov 08, 20:47
x3tc

Post by Deadbeat_Spinn » Mon, 28. Dec 09, 01:00

Destroyers aren't meant to be fast.
The Boreas has that pricetag because it's the most overpowered M2 in the game (even after a nerfing) despite being labeled a "light" destroyer.
The Split always trade shielding for speed/firepower.

hallegue
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri, 24. Aug 07, 21:40
x3

Post by hallegue » Mon, 28. Dec 09, 01:05

So the Boreas is better than the Titan? the titan can have 24 PPCs.
8 front
8 right
8 left
and that is power, is the Boreas more powerful?
Can you get more PPCs? :?

AgamemnonArgon
Posts: 2758
Joined: Thu, 19. Nov 09, 22:12
x3tc

Post by AgamemnonArgon » Mon, 28. Dec 09, 01:09

Having "flown" the Boreas in attacks, I find it better than the X2 Titan, despite a lack of fighters slung underneath. It turns fast, and the PPCs wreak havok on most things, although it took both Boreas to finally destroy Dukes.
It flies straight, it turns well, and is not sluggish. The speed is good and the view is great - especially with all those cannons firing front and sides.
Even a large pack of fighters are dealt with by this beast.
I have 3 sets of 8 rows of PPCs on both Boreas. And other weaponry such as EBC and Flak.
Argon Patriot and Battlemaster
Peace - Through Superior Firepower

User avatar
Deadbeat_Spinn
Posts: 6483
Joined: Wed, 19. Nov 08, 20:47
x3tc

Post by Deadbeat_Spinn » Mon, 28. Dec 09, 01:14

Power isn't always the amount/type of weapons the ship can mount. True power is in the weapons generator and the Boreas' is bigger than the Titans' so it can maintain fire for a longer period of time.
I don't recall who said this
Prior to the nerfing a Boreas could fire almost indefinitely, after the nerfing you have to take a slight break from firing every now and then.
(though not exactly in those words).

Plus a Boreas is faster and has more shielding (as well as the shield recharge rate) than a Titan though the Titan has a bigger cargo bay.

hallegue
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri, 24. Aug 07, 21:40
x3

Post by hallegue » Mon, 28. Dec 09, 01:20

Ok guys I am getting a Boreas you convince me. Thanks a million for your help, I will be having a nice get together in Sector 101 with my friends the Xenos tonight !!!!!
Have a good one friends.
:lol:
:D

brucewarren
Posts: 9243
Joined: Wed, 26. Mar 08, 14:15
x3tc

Post by brucewarren » Mon, 28. Dec 09, 01:23

A Boreas can also pack 8 PPC on the back and is faster than a K, so you
can do a manouevre that involves an apparent retreat when you are
outnumbered.

It's 'apparent' because if you match speeds at the proper range when he
is chasing you it's possible to generously hand out some "Photon Pulse pie"
without having to accept any in return.

hallegue
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri, 24. Aug 07, 21:40
x3

Post by hallegue » Mon, 28. Dec 09, 01:39

Again guys you have very good points and i really appreciate your in put, just for the record I got my boreas and the command view is excellent.
Many thanks, I am going to have a nice dinner with my friends the Xenons in sector 101.
:roll:

AgamemnonArgon
Posts: 2758
Joined: Thu, 19. Nov 09, 22:12
x3tc

Post by AgamemnonArgon » Mon, 28. Dec 09, 08:52

Boreas loadout for one of mine is 32 PPC, 4 CIG and 4 EBC.
If you have the money, Reputation, and can find the weapons, buy one.
Argon Patriot and Battlemaster
Peace - Through Superior Firepower

simo98
Posts: 144
Joined: Wed, 20. May 09, 12:09

Post by simo98 » Mon, 28. Dec 09, 11:51

The Boron destroyer is actually really nice.

Load her up front with 3 X 8 PPCs/IBLs/ICs and pew pew pew!
-Eh, ill get around to it.

User avatar
EmperorJon
Posts: 9378
Joined: Mon, 29. Dec 08, 20:58
x3tc

Post by EmperorJon » Mon, 28. Dec 09, 12:03

I like to Osaka, because it's really fun to fly. Charge up your front guns and BAAM, goodbye Xenon Q in one blast.
______
I'm Jon. I'm mostly not around any more. If you want to talk, please message me! It's cool.
______

brattbags01
Posts: 834
Joined: Thu, 12. Nov 09, 10:16
x3tc

Post by brattbags01 » Wed, 30. Dec 09, 11:28

Same here, i have one Boreas fitted out with 8 ppc front, 8 ppc back, 8 ibl right, 8 ibl left, 4 ibl up and 4 down. Just keep flying and firing :) also the osaka when fullt spec,d is awesome, took on Akuma destroyer, about 40 fighters and 2 yaki TL,s and my shields were hardly scratched. Dont bother with Argon or Teladi capital ships....to slow. For forward veiw then the split Python looks really cool but is under shielded and under armed and from an outside combat perspective then the Boron Ray looks easily the coolest. Needless to say i have them all :P

zyriel
Posts: 884
Joined: Fri, 16. Jan 09, 21:39
x4

Post by zyriel » Wed, 30. Dec 09, 11:44

Deadbeat_Spinn wrote:Destroyers aren't meant to be fast.
The Boreas has that pricetag because it's the most overpowered M2 in the game (even after a nerfing) despite being labeled a "light" destroyer.
The Split always trade shielding for speed/firepower.
i totally disagree about Boreas being Most overpowered one
im pretty sure Osaka can kill anything faster
also Osaka has better solo survivability in any sector in the game
Osaka has:
+20% more shields
+20% better shield generator
+50% more laser energy
+16% better laser reload
+17% bigger cargobay ,
compared to Boreas
and Boreas is only +9m/s faster than Osaka

those are just numbers - but in practice Osaka is about 10 times more powerful than expected mainly beacause of how the PSP is dealing the damage
didnt bother much with the missiles on Osaka cos i didnt have the need for more power but terran missiles are wayyyyy overpowered as well
poltergeist sucks but all other missiles are just too good

Paladin-Solo
Posts: 336
Joined: Sun, 9. Aug 09, 19:16

Post by Paladin-Solo » Wed, 30. Dec 09, 19:16

zyriel wrote:
Deadbeat_Spinn wrote:Destroyers aren't meant to be fast.
The Boreas has that pricetag because it's the most overpowered M2 in the game (even after a nerfing) despite being labeled a "light" destroyer.
The Split always trade shielding for speed/firepower.
i totally disagree about Boreas being Most overpowered one
im pretty sure Osaka can kill anything faster
also Osaka has better solo survivability in any sector in the game
Osaka has:
+20% more shields
+20% better shield generator
+50% more laser energy
+16% better laser reload
+17% bigger cargobay ,
compared to Boreas
and Boreas is only +9m/s faster than Osaka

those are just numbers - but in practice Osaka is about 10 times more powerful than expected mainly beacause of how the PSP is dealing the damage
didnt bother much with the missiles on Osaka cos i didnt have the need for more power but terran missiles are wayyyyy overpowered as well
poltergeist sucks but all other missiles are just too good
The Tyr is probably the best M2 in my opinion, not much can withstand a full volley from 20 PSPs, plus its the fastest M2. Most people bag on it though cause its cargo bay isn't big enough to equip all 32 PSPs but this is really only an issue if you want to use it in OOS, in which case the Osaka or Boreas are better, but for personal use nothing is better.

zyriel
Posts: 884
Joined: Fri, 16. Jan 09, 21:39
x4

Post by zyriel » Wed, 30. Dec 09, 19:47

Tyr is bit tough to get - especially in 2.5
also almost nothing can withstand full volley of 16xPSP-s too
so its almost the same with Osaka
Osaka has much better shield regeneration , bit better laser reload , bigger cargobay
and most of all really great view - prolly best M2 view in the game
therefore i still prefer Osaka

PS: i never said Osaka is the most powerful one i just said its greatly more powerful than Boreas :D

AgamemnonArgon
Posts: 2758
Joined: Thu, 19. Nov 09, 22:12
x3tc

Post by AgamemnonArgon » Wed, 30. Dec 09, 19:56

Good comments, but remember affordability. It can be harder to make credits on 2.5 (which I admit is good), than previous versions.
Terran ships reportedly (I don't have any) are the best fighting ships.
Owning a battlewagon isn't enough though.
For a first destroyer, I would actually go for the cheapest possible, just to get into the market !
Argon Patriot and Battlemaster
Peace - Through Superior Firepower

Post Reply

Return to “X Trilogy Universe”