M1 or M2 which?
Moderator: Moderators for English X Forum
M1 or M2 which?
Hi there,
I have 66 ships including a Panther and a Demois fully loaded, and I want to get a ship to go to the Xenon sectors and kick some a??.
I have 166 millions and 37 PPCs and the necessary shields.
Can you guys tell me which should i buy???
Your comments will be really appreciated
I have 66 ships including a Panther and a Demois fully loaded, and I want to get a ship to go to the Xenon sectors and kick some a??.
I have 166 millions and 37 PPCs and the necessary shields.
Can you guys tell me which should i buy???
Your comments will be really appreciated
-
- Posts: 2758
- Joined: Thu, 19. Nov 09, 22:12
Two choices, Boreas or (unsurprisingly) a Boreas.
I went into Dukes, with two Boreas and four Shrikes, and cleared the place out last week.
Getting the weapons is the problem. I don't own my own large heavy weapons complexes, so rely on the NPC stations. I keep ships on station just to buy the things as they appear.
Although, must admit, I have considered a Paranid destroyer, but don't want a third type on inventory (I own four Phoenix also).
Buy OTAS, you won't be disappointed.
I went into Dukes, with two Boreas and four Shrikes, and cleared the place out last week.
Getting the weapons is the problem. I don't own my own large heavy weapons complexes, so rely on the NPC stations. I keep ships on station just to buy the things as they appear.
Although, must admit, I have considered a Paranid destroyer, but don't want a third type on inventory (I own four Phoenix also).
Buy OTAS, you won't be disappointed.
Argon Patriot and Battlemaster
Peace - Through Superior Firepower
Peace - Through Superior Firepower
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Fri, 14. Aug 09, 04:05
Hope you have the rank too, for the ship you want.
So far, the Split Python (M2) and Raptor (M1) are my nasty faves. (Not including modding or such of course.) And actually, the Teladi Phoenix (M2) and Condor (M1) are my next vanilla choices. The Argon versions come next. Terran after, then Paranid and then Boron. (Course it's more like 1A then 1B then so on and all for me.)
So far, the Split Python (M2) and Raptor (M1) are my nasty faves. (Not including modding or such of course.) And actually, the Teladi Phoenix (M2) and Condor (M1) are my next vanilla choices. The Argon versions come next. Terran after, then Paranid and then Boron. (Course it's more like 1A then 1B then so on and all for me.)
Ship: GSS Valkyrie Knight (Apricot Vidasaurus)
Fighting Rank: Battlemaster
Trading Rank: Super-Magnate
Can I ***modified*** the ding dong weather too?
- Deadbeat_Spinn
- Posts: 6483
- Joined: Wed, 19. Nov 08, 20:47
-
- Posts: 2758
- Joined: Thu, 19. Nov 09, 22:12
Having "flown" the Boreas in attacks, I find it better than the X2 Titan, despite a lack of fighters slung underneath. It turns fast, and the PPCs wreak havok on most things, although it took both Boreas to finally destroy Dukes.
It flies straight, it turns well, and is not sluggish. The speed is good and the view is great - especially with all those cannons firing front and sides.
Even a large pack of fighters are dealt with by this beast.
I have 3 sets of 8 rows of PPCs on both Boreas. And other weaponry such as EBC and Flak.
It flies straight, it turns well, and is not sluggish. The speed is good and the view is great - especially with all those cannons firing front and sides.
Even a large pack of fighters are dealt with by this beast.
I have 3 sets of 8 rows of PPCs on both Boreas. And other weaponry such as EBC and Flak.
Argon Patriot and Battlemaster
Peace - Through Superior Firepower
Peace - Through Superior Firepower
- Deadbeat_Spinn
- Posts: 6483
- Joined: Wed, 19. Nov 08, 20:47
Power isn't always the amount/type of weapons the ship can mount. True power is in the weapons generator and the Boreas' is bigger than the Titans' so it can maintain fire for a longer period of time.
I don't recall who said this
Plus a Boreas is faster and has more shielding (as well as the shield recharge rate) than a Titan though the Titan has a bigger cargo bay.
I don't recall who said this
(though not exactly in those words).Prior to the nerfing a Boreas could fire almost indefinitely, after the nerfing you have to take a slight break from firing every now and then.
Plus a Boreas is faster and has more shielding (as well as the shield recharge rate) than a Titan though the Titan has a bigger cargo bay.
-
- Posts: 9243
- Joined: Wed, 26. Mar 08, 14:15
A Boreas can also pack 8 PPC on the back and is faster than a K, so you
can do a manouevre that involves an apparent retreat when you are
outnumbered.
It's 'apparent' because if you match speeds at the proper range when he
is chasing you it's possible to generously hand out some "Photon Pulse pie"
without having to accept any in return.
can do a manouevre that involves an apparent retreat when you are
outnumbered.
It's 'apparent' because if you match speeds at the proper range when he
is chasing you it's possible to generously hand out some "Photon Pulse pie"
without having to accept any in return.
-
- Posts: 2758
- Joined: Thu, 19. Nov 09, 22:12
- EmperorJon
- Posts: 9378
- Joined: Mon, 29. Dec 08, 20:58
-
- Posts: 834
- Joined: Thu, 12. Nov 09, 10:16
Same here, i have one Boreas fitted out with 8 ppc front, 8 ppc back, 8 ibl right, 8 ibl left, 4 ibl up and 4 down. Just keep flying and firing also the osaka when fullt spec,d is awesome, took on Akuma destroyer, about 40 fighters and 2 yaki TL,s and my shields were hardly scratched. Dont bother with Argon or Teladi capital ships....to slow. For forward veiw then the split Python looks really cool but is under shielded and under armed and from an outside combat perspective then the Boron Ray looks easily the coolest. Needless to say i have them all
i totally disagree about Boreas being Most overpowered oneDeadbeat_Spinn wrote:Destroyers aren't meant to be fast.
The Boreas has that pricetag because it's the most overpowered M2 in the game (even after a nerfing) despite being labeled a "light" destroyer.
The Split always trade shielding for speed/firepower.
im pretty sure Osaka can kill anything faster
also Osaka has better solo survivability in any sector in the game
Osaka has:
+20% more shields
+20% better shield generator
+50% more laser energy
+16% better laser reload
+17% bigger cargobay ,
compared to Boreas
and Boreas is only +9m/s faster than Osaka
those are just numbers - but in practice Osaka is about 10 times more powerful than expected mainly beacause of how the PSP is dealing the damage
didnt bother much with the missiles on Osaka cos i didnt have the need for more power but terran missiles are wayyyyy overpowered as well
poltergeist sucks but all other missiles are just too good
-
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Sun, 9. Aug 09, 19:16
The Tyr is probably the best M2 in my opinion, not much can withstand a full volley from 20 PSPs, plus its the fastest M2. Most people bag on it though cause its cargo bay isn't big enough to equip all 32 PSPs but this is really only an issue if you want to use it in OOS, in which case the Osaka or Boreas are better, but for personal use nothing is better.zyriel wrote:i totally disagree about Boreas being Most overpowered oneDeadbeat_Spinn wrote:Destroyers aren't meant to be fast.
The Boreas has that pricetag because it's the most overpowered M2 in the game (even after a nerfing) despite being labeled a "light" destroyer.
The Split always trade shielding for speed/firepower.
im pretty sure Osaka can kill anything faster
also Osaka has better solo survivability in any sector in the game
Osaka has:
+20% more shields
+20% better shield generator
+50% more laser energy
+16% better laser reload
+17% bigger cargobay ,
compared to Boreas
and Boreas is only +9m/s faster than Osaka
those are just numbers - but in practice Osaka is about 10 times more powerful than expected mainly beacause of how the PSP is dealing the damage
didnt bother much with the missiles on Osaka cos i didnt have the need for more power but terran missiles are wayyyyy overpowered as well
poltergeist sucks but all other missiles are just too good
Tyr is bit tough to get - especially in 2.5
also almost nothing can withstand full volley of 16xPSP-s too
so its almost the same with Osaka
Osaka has much better shield regeneration , bit better laser reload , bigger cargobay
and most of all really great view - prolly best M2 view in the game
therefore i still prefer Osaka
PS: i never said Osaka is the most powerful one i just said its greatly more powerful than Boreas
also almost nothing can withstand full volley of 16xPSP-s too
so its almost the same with Osaka
Osaka has much better shield regeneration , bit better laser reload , bigger cargobay
and most of all really great view - prolly best M2 view in the game
therefore i still prefer Osaka
PS: i never said Osaka is the most powerful one i just said its greatly more powerful than Boreas
-
- Posts: 2758
- Joined: Thu, 19. Nov 09, 22:12
Good comments, but remember affordability. It can be harder to make credits on 2.5 (which I admit is good), than previous versions.
Terran ships reportedly (I don't have any) are the best fighting ships.
Owning a battlewagon isn't enough though.
For a first destroyer, I would actually go for the cheapest possible, just to get into the market !
Terran ships reportedly (I don't have any) are the best fighting ships.
Owning a battlewagon isn't enough though.
For a first destroyer, I would actually go for the cheapest possible, just to get into the market !
Argon Patriot and Battlemaster
Peace - Through Superior Firepower
Peace - Through Superior Firepower