X3AP Most Well Armed M2
Moderator: Moderators for English X Forum
X3AP Most Well Armed M2
Hey guys, which M2 has the most firepower against capital ships according to you? Non paranid & boron if possible.
Guess that would be the Tyr.
If you manage to get your right side towards the enemy, that is. The AP version still hasn't enough cargo space to carry the full loadout.
If you manage to get your right side towards the enemy, that is. The AP version still hasn't enough cargo space to carry the full loadout.
"An open mind is like a fortress with its gate unbarred and unguarded."
dzhedzho wrote: Trade - insults with other community members, or tips how to improve performance
Fight - with steam for refund, or the overwhelming feeling of hopelessness
Build - your patience and knowledge of xml save editing.
Think - before you preorder next time
- Old Drullo321
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: Sat, 7. Feb 04, 16:01
What do you prefer?
From the list of buyable ships based on "stats only" itg would be the Tyr. But also in AP it is only a paper tiger because it has not enough cargo to carry all weapons/shield (not to mention some rockets and energy cells if you want to fly it on your own).
Otherwise the Boreas should be a good choice. Good stats and also in AI hands a powerful weapon. Its only disadvantage, it looks like an ant
From the list of buyable ships based on "stats only" itg would be the Tyr. But also in AP it is only a paper tiger because it has not enough cargo to carry all weapons/shield (not to mention some rockets and energy cells if you want to fly it on your own).
Otherwise the Boreas should be a good choice. Good stats and also in AI hands a powerful weapon. Its only disadvantage, it looks like an ant
the tyr has 900+ cargo leftover when everything is accounted for.
thats enough for a few jumps.
thats enough for a few jumps.
Just saying it forward: I give everyone 2 posts to make good, in context posts(proper english, as always, is optional). After that I'm ignoring what you have to say in that thread that's directed to what we previously were talking about.
using the optimal loadout, not this silly notion that "if it can mount PSP, then it must mount PSP" notion.
Just saying it forward: I give everyone 2 posts to make good, in context posts(proper english, as always, is optional). After that I'm ignoring what you have to say in that thread that's directed to what we previously were talking about.
Boreas only has 40 guns thought. I just really wanna melt something, don't care much for shields. Steering is important tho (I wanna dodge bullets).
The Tyr looks like it has a bunch of guns, but can both Front and Side batteries shoot at the same target, and if so, how much do I need to turn my ship.
The Tyr looks like it has a bunch of guns, but can both Front and Side batteries shoot at the same target, and if so, how much do I need to turn my ship.
The Boreas has less guns than other heavy-duty capital ships, but it has phenomenal weapon compatibility, and loaded with IBLs and PPCs it can still put out incredible amounts of damage. It's also quite agile for a destroyer with a very small profile for its class.
Admitting you have a problem is the first step in figuring out how to make it worse.
-
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Sat, 9. Sep 06, 13:23
Maybe they recruited a rogue Split ship designer, since the description says it was built to counter the Split, they clearly needed a fresh take on ship design, since their previous iterations weren't up to the task. Just throwing that out there.Sakurabisu wrote:The Megalodon's turret configuration is poor compared to most other M2s. It's also rather odd lore-wise. A Boron ship with none of the traditional Boron Ion Disruptors/Pulse Generators/Cannons, but Ion Shard Railguns in every slot? Did a Split in a Boron mask sneak his way onto the design comittee?
you dont need to turn the ship to fire forward. =PSesk wrote:Boreas only has 40 guns thought. I just really wanna melt something, don't care much for shields. Steering is important tho (I wanna dodge bullets).
The Tyr looks like it has a bunch of guns, but can both Front and Side batteries shoot at the same target, and if so, how much do I need to turn my ship.
Just saying it forward: I give everyone 2 posts to make good, in context posts(proper english, as always, is optional). After that I'm ignoring what you have to say in that thread that's directed to what we previously were talking about.
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue, 9. May 06, 04:26
Ok, lots of answers and everybody ignored the supposedly buffed split destroyer. For anti-capital duty it beats all other ships really. 6+6+8 PPC on target and very slim profile. I am test-driving Megaloodon now and it actually losses in competition because you can't really dodge fire in it. In Python you can clear all Xenon sectors without shield recharge (with some skill of course).
Valhalla - too fat and it is a bullet magnet. Unless they fixed turrets since TC, it is a bit broken as well. Also, can't jump without support ships.
Tyr - OK, but not enough cargo for the full loadout
Kyoto - that is a decent competitor, but only if you mostly rely on its docked M8. One on one combat is doable, but Python beats it. Due to the slim profile it also can dodge, even with its size.
Boreas - it is just OK now when somebody stole its shield.
Valhalla - too fat and it is a bullet magnet. Unless they fixed turrets since TC, it is a bit broken as well. Also, can't jump without support ships.
Tyr - OK, but not enough cargo for the full loadout
Kyoto - that is a decent competitor, but only if you mostly rely on its docked M8. One on one combat is doable, but Python beats it. Due to the slim profile it also can dodge, even with its size.
Boreas - it is just OK now when somebody stole its shield.
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue, 9. May 06, 04:26