Post
by Morkonan » Mon, 13. Aug 18, 21:31
Something prompted by the above posts involving characters and their backgrounds and something I read about storycrafting:
How much "character" is too much "character?"
Compared to TOS, TNG took "character" to a whole new level. Character background, backstories written from whole cloth pushed to the forefront, only important because they require viewer investment in the character, character relationships forming the basis for a story, character "development" spanning episodes, but then conspicuously absent when it would seem to matter most, etc...
IMO, TNG had some good episodes and storylines, but it was missing something when compared to TOS. So, what was it? I've sort of wrestled with that for awhile, given a new generation's enthusiasm for the series. Well, I think I found it - "Too much character stuffs." At least, in comparison.
Sure, TOS had many episodes dealing with characters, but not to the extent that TNG and, perhaps, DS9 (which I also didn't like much). TNG also had a penchant for running character development/exploration subplots, too, which watered down the story for me.
Anyway, obviously something for it's own thread if anyone really wanted to go in-depth. Besides the studio's penchant for trying to draw on nostalgia to increase interest, which all the IP-owners have done, I think this sort of thing is a major theme for series in the TNG/DS9 era and, perhaps, other series to come. Maybe?
Will we see Picard dealing with geriatric care and an argument with his physician over a new love interest and his heart condition? Maybe he can't take "Virile Pills" and is having problems defining himself as a man? (Sounds like a typical TNG subplot to me...)
Where's the... "adventure" in that?