the AZ press release wrote:including the update of the product information
Repeating something with no source doesn't make it true. Where medical regulators have recommended the inclusion of warnings, warnings have been included. (Note that this is not AZ's decision in isolation, and as discussed elsewhere inclusion of spurious warnings may put people off receiving their vaccines, so some national regulators do not appear to have made this recommendation.) This is trivial to verify by looking up the information sheets in question. If you believe something different has happened, source up.the Atlantic article you posted wrote:In the meantime, the agency has added a warning to the vaccine’s drug leaflet for the European Union. (...) Similar warnings have been issued in Canada and Australia.
+1 to Mailo's risk analysis.