Vertigo 7 wrote: ↑Sun, 27. Feb 22, 19:20
Chips wrote: ↑Sun, 27. Feb 22, 19:06
Vertigo 7 wrote: ↑Sun, 27. Feb 22, 17:57
yes, well, it could also mean he's ready to nuke Ukraine.
Why do people assume Putin is threatening to nuke anything? He's previously said anyone intervening will see the ... blah blah of such no-one has ever seen. I didn't take that to mean he'd actually nuke, I took that to mean "STAY OUT OF IT OR ELSE"... but maybe he is nuts. In other words, rhetoric. Without actually directly confronting Russia, what would he tell his people?
I've taken his latest upping of the ante to mean "You're starting to interfere too much", which in all honestly also means things are going to hell in a hand basket for Russia. That's not a bad thing, as it is going to be a balancing act on how much support western countries give, and how Putin views it all.
I don't think it means nukes, I think it's just rhetoric to try and get people to back off or not supply even more.
I can't believe (maybe I'm naïve) that any armed forces would 1st strike nuke against any target, let alone one that isn't nuclear itself; that includes Russian military let by Putin. Surely they'd go "wait, this is nuts..." and ignore the bellend. Nukes have for a long time been mutual assured destruction, not first strike tantrum over a conventional war that no-one in the entire world is supporting.
It's simple. Putin is a proven liar. I wouldn't put anything past him. Not to mention, all signs point to him be a friggin basket case with his obsession over the fallen USSR. It's honestly safer to assume he will and be wrong than to convince yourself he won't and be wrong.
He's willing to throw the lives of his people away in the thousands over a lie. If he thinks he can nuke Ukraine and doesn't fear repercussions or thinks no one will respond, he'll do it.
*edit
FYI - EURCOM moved to DEFCON 2 today.
I should have made it more specific, i meant employ the use of nukes in Ukraine. I took it as a warning to the rest of Europe/USA that if they keep upping the ante with their contributions (weapons, and now planes?) or being seen to encourage citizens to go and fight for Ukraine (as per UK in the news yesterday) -- basically re-backing up "if you interefere in this action...", rather than he's thinking about blowing up Ukraine because things have hit a snag for him.
So from that I just couldn't imagine he'd nuke Ukraine, or target others in Europe instead? It's a dangerous game to play, hence why I thought he's just trying to re-iterate with more strength the threats over outside interference. But perhaps he really is bonkers rather than scheming. Things appear on the face of it to be going badly for Russia... and therefore it'll be really bad for Putin; cornered animals are the most unpredictable. Right now, Europe and the rest seem to have gone from "Good luck Ukraine" to "we can help in every way except with our own soldiers". But sending that hardware may be the thing that tips this - as I imagine if Russia *had* proper air superiority, they'd be taking out convoys coming into the country as soon as they crossed the border from Poland. The more stuff we're sending then the worse it's going to get for Russia. At that point, what does Putin do... his whole image is based on fear and control. If he's losing control of this situation then what move will he make? There were reports of some "thermobaric" weapon moving up to the border... sounds moderately horrific. Maybe he'll change tack, or maybe he'll view it as "a world without me is a world not worth living..." and go mental. Hope not, but he does have that kind of personality doesn't he.
As for rhetoric and whipping things up - there was some mental reporter/presenter in Russia who said something akin to "what's the point of a world without Russia in it" -- which is insane, as no-one is threatening to destroy Russia and the only one remotely capable of doing so at present is your own damned President. So how about reporting what's going on instead of hyping up your governments madness with complete and utter insanely misguided statements.
Things seem to be going badly, but neither side can paint the entire picture of how things are (well, certainly we can't rely on anything from Russia as they've only just admitted they've a few casualties, let alone the thousands that Ukraine is claiming Russia has so far lost). It does appear that they've either badly mistaken the resistance, or thought moving quickly with minimal troops would cause an Afghanistan like capitulation without a shot being fired. Either way, it's a good thing but at the same time worrying... as with all the external pressure being exerted, is he really likely to pack up and go home? Or go full in with the entire 200k of forces.
Or maybe their supply lines can't actually support a proper invasion so it's all going wrong. It'd be great if some actual knowledge of tactics and logistics and more, as well as what's actually happening. Instead, just have to trust the media and hope things continue to go well for Ukraine, or at least, as well as we can hope for (as "well" in a war is still relative to it being a bloomin war where people are dying).